• Investing
  • Stock
  • Economy
  • Editor’s Pick
Portfolio Performance Today
Economy

The Latest Trump Administration Grift: Tariff Checks

by January 23, 2026
by January 23, 2026

Does the administration think its supporters don’t understand economics? 

I would hope not, but some of their policies and proposals make one wonder. On Tuesday, President Trump revived the idea of a $2,000 tariff “dividend” check. Although the politics make sense, the administration assumes people don’t understand basic economic theory. President Trump has painted tariffs as making the American economy more competitive and more productive while simultaneously extracting money from foreigners who pay the Treasury.

If that’s what was happening, economists would be cheering the tariffs. Unfortunately, President Trump’s understanding of tariffs is just as faulty as his understanding of how much revenue the tariffs have raised. High tariffs don’t make the American economy more competitive. They make it less competitive, because it becomes harder and more costly to build and manufacture. Nor do high tariffs increase production — just the opposite. US manufacturing output has declined over the past year.

And the notion that foreigners bear the burden of paying tariff taxes to the Treasury misses the fact that they turn around and collect more dollars from American businesses and consumers who pay higher prices for imported goods. The great irony of Trump’s proposal is that he is simply giving people back their own money — the extra $120 they spent on coffee or tea or bananas, or the extra $90 they paid for beef or the extra $100 they paid for clothing or the extra $200 they paid for toys or electronics since “Liberation Day.”

The worst thing about this whole situation is not that Americans have already paid for the tariff checks. It’s that besides paying for it, they have had to live with a less efficient and less productive economy. At the same time, the US reputation and status on the global stage, when it came to trade, has been greatly diminished. Many of our trading partners have begun looking for more reliable trading partners. 

Despite a handful of big “commitments” of foreign investment, largely made to placate or bribe President Trump until he has moved on to the next shiny object, most companies and countries have been making plans to restructure their supply chains and trading arrangements in light of the US being a much less attractive trading partner. Not only that, but the US trade deficit has ballooned during Trump’s first year.

But back to the topic of tariff checks. 

Who doesn’t want to receive a $2,000 check (or maybe several checks if kids receive them too)? I would certainly appreciate getting one! The problem, though, can be seen in the tagline: “When everyone is special, no one is.” Everyone getting more dollars without more production doesn’t actually make our country wealthier. Real benefit comes from higher production in the economy.

Millions of Americans were happy to receive COVID-19 stimulus checks. But ask yourself, “Would I want those checks and the subsequent high inflation, or would I have preferred prices to remain low and stable?” Most thoughtful people would say the latter, because the stimulus checks were temporary and quickly spent. The higher prices, however, are here to stay — and our children and grandchildren will have to live with higher prices too.

So let’s not kid ourselves. Trump’s tariff dividend check idea is a destructive short-run play for popular support. It won’t solve anyone’s financial problems. It won’t boost employment. And it won’t fix any of the inefficiencies created by his high-tariff regime. If anything, it will stoke inflation and fuel the fire of class warfare since he has proposed that some people get checks and others will not, based on their income. Nor can the executive branch unilaterally send “tariff dividend” checks to the American people without appropriation from Congress.

If Trump wants to make the American economy great again, he should stop pursuing gimmicks and ad hoc investment commitments. He should replace the current hodgepodge of tariffs with a low, flat rate that doesn’t raise the cost of doing business in the US much and still allows an abundant flow of trade across our borders. He might raise more tariff revenue under such a regime.Finally, the administration should redouble its efforts to implement deep institutional reforms – such as streamlining and reducing regulations around nuclear power, mining, drug R&D, and dozens of other industries – that will allow Americans greater scope and opportunity to improve their lives without relying on checks from Washington.

0 comment
0
FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

previous post
Three Lessons from Venezuela’s Economic Collapse

Related Posts

Three Lessons from Venezuela’s Economic Collapse

January 23, 2026

White House explains bruise on Trump’s hand

January 23, 2026

Convicted Minnesota fraudster alleges Walz, Ellison were aware...

January 23, 2026

Countries that signed Trump’s Gaza Board of Peace...

January 23, 2026

Trump admin stops funding for research that involves...

January 23, 2026

GOP lawmaker accuses Jack Smith of ‘spying’ on...

January 23, 2026

Jim Jordan says FBI searched Barron Trump’s room...

January 23, 2026

White House baby boom in full bloom as...

January 23, 2026

Patel reveals bizarre ‘self-awarded’ trophy former FBI officials...

January 23, 2026

Trump says US should have tested NATO by...

January 23, 2026

Stay updated with the latest news, exclusive offers, and special promotions. Sign up now and be the first to know! As a member, you'll receive curated content, insider tips, and invitations to exclusive events. Don't miss out on being part of something special.

By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

Recent Posts

  • The Latest Trump Administration Grift: Tariff Checks

    January 23, 2026
  • Three Lessons from Venezuela’s Economic Collapse

    January 23, 2026
  • Tageos and Wiliot Partner on Battery-Free BLE Sensing

    January 23, 2026
  • Capital One to buy stablecoin fintech Brex for $5.15B in cash-and-stock deal

    January 23, 2026
  • Morning brief: Asian stocks rise after BOJ decision, TikTok seals US deal

    January 23, 2026
  • Silver within a whisker of $100/oz; gold nears $5,000—what’s behind the rally?

    January 23, 2026

Editors’ Picks

  • 1

    Pop Mart reports 188% profit surge, plans aggressive global expansion

    March 26, 2025
  • 2

    Meta executives eligible for 200% salary bonus under new pay structure

    February 21, 2025
  • 3

    New FBI leader Kash Patel tapped to run ATF as acting director

    February 23, 2025
  • 4

    Anthropic’s newly released Claude 3.7 Sonnet can ‘think’ as long as the user wants before giving an answer

    February 25, 2025
  • 5

    Walmart earnings preview: What to expect before Thursday’s opening bell

    February 20, 2025
  • 6

    Cramer reveals a sub-sector of technology that can withstand Trump tariffs

    March 1, 2025
  • 7

    Nvidia’s investment in SoundHound wasn’t all that significant after all

    March 1, 2025

Categories

  • Economy (3,900)
  • Editor's Pick (416)
  • Investing (404)
  • Stock (2,611)
  • About us
  • Contact us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions

Copyright © 2025 Portfolioperformancetoday.com All Rights Reserved.

Portfolio Performance Today
  • Investing
  • Stock
  • Economy
  • Editor’s Pick
Portfolio Performance Today
  • Investing
  • Stock
  • Economy
  • Editor’s Pick
Copyright © 2025 Portfolioperformancetoday.com All Rights Reserved.

Read alsox

AIER’s Everyday Price Index Notches a Slight...

August 13, 2025

Stefanik asks AG Bondi to probe medical...

September 19, 2025

Greenland government calls Trump’s acquisition talks ‘unacceptable’

March 16, 2025