• Investing
  • Stock
  • Economy
  • Editor’s Pick
Portfolio Performance Today
Stock

GPIQ ETF beats JEPQ by far, but QQQ is a better Nasdaq 100 fund

by October 14, 2025
by October 14, 2025

The Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Premium Income ETF (GPIQ) is having a good year, with inflows rising and its stock jumping to a record high. It peaked at $52.80 on Friday, up sharply from the all-time low of $31.54. This article explores whether the 10% yielding GPIQ ETF is a good buy.

What is the GPIQ ETF and how does it work?

GPIQ ETF is Goldman Sachs’ answer to the JPMorgan Nasdaq 100 Premium Equity ETF (JEPQ), the $30 billion fund. It is a fund that aims to provide investors an exposure to the tech-heavy Nasdaq 100 Index and then generate yield. 

The fund generates a return by embracing a dynamic options ‘overwrite’ strategy, where it sells call options on a varying percentage of the market performance. 

A call option is a transaction that gives investors the right to buy an asset at a certain price before it hits the strike price. A call transaction comes with a premium, which the company uses to pay its shareholders. The premium rises when the market is highly volatile. 

Using the covered call approach has an advantage in that shareholders receive a monthly return in all market conditions. When the Nasdaq 100 Index is flat, its return will be positive as the fund will still make money from the options premium. 

Similarly, the ETF also generates an income when the Nasdaq 100 Index is in a downtrend. However, a major risk happens when the Nasdaq 100 Index rises and crosses the strike price. 

GPIQ vs JEPI vs QQQM ETFs performance

The GPIQ ETF has an expense ratio of 0.29%, which is better than JEPQ’s 0.35%, making it more ideal to investors. The two funds also have a similar dividend yield of about 10%. 

The best way to identify the better ETF to buy is to consider its total return. Data compiled by Seeking Alpha shows that the JEPQ ETF has returned 16% in the last 12 months. In contrast, the GPIQ fund has returned about 20% in the same period.

The same thing is happening this year as the GPIQ ETF has had a total return of 16% compared to JEPQ’s 10%. 

Still, history shows that investing in a generic fund like Invesco QQQ is a better approach than covered call funds like GPIQ and JEPQ. For example, QQQ ETF has had a total return of 18.20% this year, higher than GPIQ and JEPQ’s 16% and 10%. 

QQQ has returned 22% this year, compared to GPIQ and JEPQ’s 20% and 16% and 20%, respectively. As such, while the GPIQ ETF is a better fund than JEPQ. History shows that the pure QQQ ETF is a better fund to own.

The post GPIQ ETF beats JEPQ by far, but QQQ is a better Nasdaq 100 fund appeared first on Invezz

0 comment
0
FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

previous post
‘It took 3,000 years’: Trump heralds ‘golden age of the Middle East’ in speeches to Arab leaders, Israel
next post
Michelin stock slumps 9% as profit downgrade triggers concerns over 2026 targets

Related Posts

US inflation eases more than expected to 2.4%;...

February 15, 2026

Fastly stock price has soared: does it have...

February 15, 2026

Nvidia stock tumbles over 2%: why investors are...

February 14, 2026

Air Canada sees surge in corporate travel as...

February 14, 2026

Micron stock plunges on Friday: has the rally...

February 14, 2026

Rivian stock soars on Q4 earnings: why UBS...

February 14, 2026

Why Tesla stock is climbing even as Big...

February 14, 2026

Citi sees 3 major risks in Pinterest stock’s...

February 14, 2026

Cooling inflation and steady hiring ignite fresh hopes...

February 14, 2026

AI sell-off: 3 sectors it has hit the...

February 14, 2026

Stay updated with the latest news, exclusive offers, and special promotions. Sign up now and be the first to know! As a member, you'll receive curated content, insider tips, and invitations to exclusive events. Don't miss out on being part of something special.

By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

Recent Posts

  • Economic Data Revisions Show the Limits of Real-Time Measurement, Not Malfeasance

    February 19, 2026
  • The Capitalism ‘Stranger Things’ Runs On — But Pretends Not to Like

    February 19, 2026
  • Indebted to the Printing Press: Fiscal Dominance Is No Longer Theoretical

    February 19, 2026
  • Carrefour and Vusion to deploy smart stores at scale

    February 19, 2026
  • Rubio announces designation for Nicaraguan prison official tied to alleged human rights violations

    February 19, 2026
  • Trump convenes first ‘Board of Peace’ meeting as Gaza rebuild hinges on Hamas disarmament

    February 19, 2026

Editors’ Picks

  • 1

    Pop Mart reports 188% profit surge, plans aggressive global expansion

    March 26, 2025
  • 2

    New FBI leader Kash Patel tapped to run ATF as acting director

    February 23, 2025
  • 3

    Meta executives eligible for 200% salary bonus under new pay structure

    February 21, 2025
  • 4

    Anthropic’s newly released Claude 3.7 Sonnet can ‘think’ as long as the user wants before giving an answer

    February 25, 2025
  • 5

    Walmart earnings preview: What to expect before Thursday’s opening bell

    February 20, 2025
  • ‘The Value of Others’ Isn’t Especially Valuable

    April 17, 2025
  • 7

    Cramer reveals a sub-sector of technology that can withstand Trump tariffs

    March 1, 2025

Categories

  • Economy (4,195)
  • Editor's Pick (474)
  • Investing (543)
  • Stock (2,747)
  • About us
  • Contact us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions

Copyright © 2025 Portfolioperformancetoday.com All Rights Reserved.

Portfolio Performance Today
  • Investing
  • Stock
  • Economy
  • Editor’s Pick
Portfolio Performance Today
  • Investing
  • Stock
  • Economy
  • Editor’s Pick
Copyright © 2025 Portfolioperformancetoday.com All Rights Reserved.

Read alsox

Adani Group brings more women leaders into...

August 28, 2025

Here’s why Hong Kong’s Hang Seng Index...

May 30, 2025

Asian markets end higher as Mideast ceasefire...

June 25, 2025