• Investing
  • Stock
  • Economy
  • Editor’s Pick
Portfolio Performance Today
Economy

Kevin Hassett ‘very, very confident’ courts will back Trump’s tariffs amid legal setback

by June 2, 2025
by June 2, 2025

White House Economic Council Director Kevin Hassett says he remains ‘very, very confident’ that courts will support President Donald Trump’s tariff agenda.

Hassett made the statement during a Sunday morning appearance on ABC’s ‘This Week,’ telling host George Stephanopoulos that the White House still expects ‘Plan A’ to work out.

‘And so we’re very thrilled. We are very confident that the judges would uphold this law. And so I think that that’s Plan A, and we’re very, very confident that Plan A is all we’re ever going to need,’ Hassett said.

‘But if, for some reason, some judge were to say that it’s not a national emergency when more Americans die from fentanyl than have ever died in all American wars combined, that’s not an emergency that the president has authority over – if that ludicrous statement is made by a judge somewhere, then we’ll have other alternatives that we can pursue as well to make sure that we make American trade fair again,’ he added.

Hassett’s appearance comes after a federal court struck down Trump’s tariffs in a ruling last week, only for an appeals court to issue a temporary stay protecting the tariffs during litigation.

The appeals court ruling paused a decision by the U.S. Court of International Trade (CIT), thus allowing Trump to continue to enact the 10% baseline tariff and the so-called ‘reciprocal tariffs’ that he announced April 2 under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, or IEEPA. 

The CIT had ruled unanimously to block the tariffs the day before.

Members of the three-judge panel who were appointed by Trump, former President Barack Obama and former President Ronald Reagan, ruled unanimously that Trump had overstepped his authority under IEEPA.

They noted that, as commander in chief, Trump does not have ‘unbounded authority’ to impose tariffs under the emergency law.

For now, the burden of proof shifts to the government, which must convince the court it will suffer ‘irreparable harm’ if the injunction remains in place, a high legal standard the Trump administration must meet.

Fox News’ Breanne Deppisch contributed to this report

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

0 comment
0
FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

previous post
Rand Paul says he would support ‘big, beautiful bill’ if debt ceiling hike removed
next post
Trump shares post saying Biden was executed, replaced with clones

Related Posts

What Families Gain at the Dinner Table

August 7, 2025

Superman, Sneaking Snacks into Movies, and the Mystery...

August 7, 2025

Would Superman Bring Coffee to the Movies?

August 7, 2025

What Families Gain at the Dinner Table

August 7, 2025

Virginia Dem gubernatorial candidate and ex-CIA officer took...

August 7, 2025

Russia, China practice destroying ‘enemy’ submarine in naval...

August 7, 2025

Vance, Bondi, Patel to huddle at VP residence...

August 7, 2025

‘Should have been prepared’: GOP senators fight for...

August 7, 2025

Vance, Bondi, Patel to huddle at VP residence...

August 7, 2025

New Romanian law may have averted NATO clash...

August 7, 2025

Stay updated with the latest news, exclusive offers, and special promotions. Sign up now and be the first to know! As a member, you'll receive curated content, insider tips, and invitations to exclusive events. Don't miss out on being part of something special.

By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

Recent Posts

  • What Families Gain at the Dinner Table

    August 7, 2025
  • Superman, Sneaking Snacks into Movies, and the Mystery of Social Order

    August 7, 2025
  • How Telematics Is Reshaping Transportation

    August 7, 2025
  • What Families Gain at the Dinner Table

    August 7, 2025
  • Would Superman Bring Coffee to the Movies?

    August 7, 2025
  • Opendoor stock plunges 21% after weak forecast: could more downside be ahead?

    August 7, 2025

Editors’ Picks

  • 1

    Meta executives eligible for 200% salary bonus under new pay structure

    February 21, 2025
  • 2

    Walmart earnings preview: What to expect before Thursday’s opening bell

    February 20, 2025
  • 3

    New FBI leader Kash Patel tapped to run ATF as acting director

    February 23, 2025
  • 4

    Anthropic’s newly released Claude 3.7 Sonnet can ‘think’ as long as the user wants before giving an answer

    February 25, 2025
  • 5

    Nvidia’s investment in SoundHound wasn’t all that significant after all

    March 1, 2025
  • 6

    Cramer reveals a sub-sector of technology that can withstand Trump tariffs

    March 1, 2025
  • 7

    Elon Musk says federal employees must fill out productivity reports or resign

    February 23, 2025

Categories

  • Economy (2,114)
  • Editor's Pick (210)
  • Investing (185)
  • Stock (1,413)
  • About us
  • Contact us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions

Copyright © 2025 Portfolioperformancetoday.com All Rights Reserved.

Portfolio Performance Today
  • Investing
  • Stock
  • Economy
  • Editor’s Pick
Portfolio Performance Today
  • Investing
  • Stock
  • Economy
  • Editor’s Pick
Copyright © 2025 Portfolioperformancetoday.com All Rights Reserved.

Read alsox

The Trolley Problem of Taxation: Should DOGE...

March 5, 2025

Trump to meet with Netanyahu as he...

July 2, 2025

‘FOOD BABE’ VANI HARI: Don’t boo the...

April 6, 2025