• Investing
  • Stock
  • Economy
  • Editor’s Pick
Portfolio Performance Today
Stock

Citigroup’s $81 trillion blunder: how a ‘fat finger’ mistake was caught

by March 1, 2025
by March 1, 2025

Citigroup narrowly avoided what could have been one of the largest banking blunders in history after it mistakenly credited a client’s account with $81 trillion instead of the intended $280.

The Financial Times reported that the error was detected only after two employees overlooked it, with a third employee catching and correcting the mistake 90 minutes later.

Fortunately, no funds left the bank.

The US banking giant disclosed the incident to financial regulators, including the Federal Reserve and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, as part of its internal reporting procedures.

A near-impossible transaction

A transaction of $81 trillion is so vast that it would be unlikely to pass through any banking system without immediate red flags.

The sheer scale of the error was highlighted by comparisons with global financial benchmarks—the total US stock market was valued at $62 trillion at the end of 2024, while global wealth stood at approximately $450 trillion, according to UBS.

To put it into perspective, the erroneously credited sum would have been enough to buy all major US technology companies at a premium or acquire the assets of Elon Musk, the world’s richest individual, more than 200 times over.

A Citi spokesperson addressed the incident, stating, “Despite the fact that a payment of this size could not actually have been executed, our detective controls promptly identified the inputting error between two Citi ledger accounts and we reversed the entry. Our preventative controls would have also stopped any funds leaving the bank.”

“While there was no impact to the bank or our client, the episode underscores our continued efforts to continue eliminating manual processes and automating controls through our transformation,” the spokesperson added.

Citi’s history of costly errors

This is not the first time Citigroup has been at the center of an embarrassing transaction error.

In 2020, the bank mistakenly wired $900 million to creditors of Revlon instead of making a routine interest payment.

Several hedge funds, including Brigade Capital Management, HPS Investment Partners, and Symphony Asset Management, initially refused to return the funds, leading to a protracted legal battle.

Citi fought in court for two years to recover the money, with a significant portion remaining in dispute until a 2022 court ruling finally enabled the bank to reclaim the remaining $504 million from creditors.

The episode contributed to leadership changes at the bank, including the departure of then-CEO Michael Corbat.

Other instances of “accidental transfers” by banks

Citi is not the only bank to have blundered on the front of money transfer.

In 2021, a Louisiana couple found their Chase bank account credited with $50 billion due to a bank error.

It took four days for the bank to correct the mistake, making the couple one of the richest families in the world for a brief period.

“That’s not like a one zero error or a two zero error, that’s somebody that fell asleep on the keyboard error,” Darren James, the beneficiary of the amount told CNN in a report.

The post Citigroup’s $81 trillion blunder: how a ‘fat finger’ mistake was caught appeared first on Invezz

0 comment
0
FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

previous post
GM’s EV market share doubles to 12%: will Trump’s tariffs slow momentum?
next post
Short US30: bearish momentum builds as tariff risks and key support breakdown threaten further decline

Related Posts

IndiGo stock slumps 7%: analysts warn rising costs...

December 8, 2025

LGEN share price analysis: is Legal & General...

December 8, 2025

The AI bubble may burst, but it won’t...

December 8, 2025

Magnum goes solo as Unilever steps out of...

December 8, 2025

How India’s IPO boom is redefining its role...

December 8, 2025

India’s lunar strategy gathers pace as New Delhi...

December 8, 2025

Bitcoin down 3%, S&P 500 up 16%: why...

December 7, 2025

How prediction markets are fixing the ‘information problem’

December 7, 2025

What’s driving the sudden cocoa pile-up at Ivory...

December 7, 2025

Nvidia stock price is a $4.6 trillion bargain:...

December 6, 2025

Stay updated with the latest news, exclusive offers, and special promotions. Sign up now and be the first to know! As a member, you'll receive curated content, insider tips, and invitations to exclusive events. Don't miss out on being part of something special.

By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

Recent Posts

  • Cellular IoT Connections Expected to Surge to 5.9 Billion by 2035

    December 8, 2025
  • Saudi Arabia Didn’t Learn Anything From China’s ‘Ghost Cities’

    December 8, 2025
  • Hashtag Handcuffs: The Global Rise of Online Speech Policing

    December 8, 2025
  • IndiGo stock slumps 7%: analysts warn rising costs could weigh on stock

    December 8, 2025
  • LGEN share price analysis: is Legal & General a good dividend stock?

    December 8, 2025
  • The AI bubble may burst, but it won’t be as bad as many think

    December 8, 2025

Editors’ Picks

  • 1

    Pop Mart reports 188% profit surge, plans aggressive global expansion

    March 26, 2025
  • 2

    Meta executives eligible for 200% salary bonus under new pay structure

    February 21, 2025
  • 3

    New FBI leader Kash Patel tapped to run ATF as acting director

    February 23, 2025
  • 4

    Walmart earnings preview: What to expect before Thursday’s opening bell

    February 20, 2025
  • 5

    Anthropic’s newly released Claude 3.7 Sonnet can ‘think’ as long as the user wants before giving an answer

    February 25, 2025
  • 6

    Cramer reveals a sub-sector of technology that can withstand Trump tariffs

    March 1, 2025
  • 7

    Nvidia’s investment in SoundHound wasn’t all that significant after all

    March 1, 2025

Categories

  • Economy (3,437)
  • Editor's Pick (350)
  • Investing (215)
  • Stock (2,338)
  • About us
  • Contact us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions

Copyright © 2025 Portfolioperformancetoday.com All Rights Reserved.

Portfolio Performance Today
  • Investing
  • Stock
  • Economy
  • Editor’s Pick
Portfolio Performance Today
  • Investing
  • Stock
  • Economy
  • Editor’s Pick
Copyright © 2025 Portfolioperformancetoday.com All Rights Reserved.

Read alsox

Singapore’s cross-border interconnections set to unlock 25...

June 3, 2025

How China’s 34% tariff on US imports...

April 5, 2025

Why is tech at war over AI...

August 21, 2025