• Investing
  • Stock
  • Economy
  • Editor’s Pick
Portfolio Performance Today
Economy

Trump responds to Supreme Court ruling rejecting sweeping tariffs powers: ‘A disgrace’

by February 21, 2026
by February 21, 2026

President Donald Trump has reportedly reacted to the Supreme Court’s 6-3 decision that ruled he does not have the authority to levy sweeping tariffs under a specific emergency powers law.

A source outside the Trump administration told Fox News that an aide came into the closed-door White House breakfast with governors and handed Trump a note about the Supreme Court ruling.

The source said Trump ‘called it a disgrace, and then he went on with the remarks.’

The high court blocked Trump’s tariffs levied under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act in what amounts to a major test of executive branch authority. 

Some of the Supreme Court’s nine justices will likely be sitting in the audience when the president delivers the State of the Union address on Tuesday.

In the opinion, the high court declared, ‘Our task today is to decide only whether the power to ‘regulate… importation,’ as granted to the President in IEEPA, embraces the power to impose tariffs. It does not.’

Trump has made tariffs a key plank of his economic agenda since retaking the Oval Office last year, but his policies have not come without controversy.

Republican reaction to the ruling has been mixed.

Rep. Buddy Carter, R-Ga., slammed the high court’s decision.

‘The Supreme Court just undercut the President’s ability to defend American workers. President Donald Trump was elected to fight unfair trade and stop the United States from being ripped off. I’m outraged by this decision; it’s clearly judicial overreach,’ Carter asserted in a post on X.

But Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., welcomed the ruling.

‘In defense of our Republic, the Supreme Court struck down using emergency powers to enact taxes. This ruling will also prevent a future President such as AOC from using emergency powers to enact socialism,’ Paul noted in a post on X.

Rep. Don Bacon, R-Neb., also hailed the decision.

‘The Constitution’s checks and balances still work. Article One gives tariff authority to Congress. This was a common-sense and straightforward ruling by the Supreme Court. I feel vindicated as I’ve been saying this for the last 12 months. In the future, Congress should defend its own authorities and not rely on the Supreme Court. Besides the Constitutional concerns I had on the Administration’s broad-based tariffs, I also do not think tariffs are smart economic policy. Broad-based tariffs are bad economics,’ Bacon wrote in a post on X.

This is a developing story. Please check back for updates.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

0 comment
0
FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

previous post
Republicans shred ‘nonsense’ Dem claims against Trump-backed voter ID bill
next post
IoT Platform Selection: Five Traps to Avoid

Related Posts

Warsh: The Fed Helped Create Fiscal Dominance

March 13, 2026

The End of Pax Americana

March 13, 2026

Entrepreneurs Take on the Funeral Monopoly: When Selling...

March 12, 2026

The Fed Has a Groupthink Problem. Warsh Can...

March 12, 2026

From Biden’s ‘war’ on gas prices to ‘small...

March 12, 2026

US diplomatic facility in Iraq struck by drone

March 12, 2026

171 million travelers face airport delays as Democrats’...

March 12, 2026

From Biden’s ‘war’ on gas prices to ‘small...

March 12, 2026

FDA launches new AI-powered system to track drug...

March 12, 2026

DAVID MARCUS: Sen Thune has no idea how...

March 12, 2026

Stay updated with the latest news, exclusive offers, and special promotions. Sign up now and be the first to know! As a member, you'll receive curated content, insider tips, and invitations to exclusive events. Don't miss out on being part of something special.

By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

Recent Posts

  • Rivian stock forecast: Wyckoff theory points to long‑term rebound

    March 14, 2026
  • Iran war is breaking your portfolio: here are 5 ways to fix it

    March 14, 2026
  • COWZ stock: Is it safe to buy this dividend ETF dip?

    March 14, 2026
  • Nvidia stock in the red today: what to expect at GTC

    March 14, 2026
  • Tesla stock trades in red, but 3 big catalysts say buy the dip now

    March 14, 2026
  • Ulta Beauty stock’s post-earnings sell-off is a gift for long-term investors

    March 14, 2026

Editors’ Picks

  • 1

    Pop Mart reports 188% profit surge, plans aggressive global expansion

    March 26, 2025
  • 2

    New FBI leader Kash Patel tapped to run ATF as acting director

    February 23, 2025
  • 3

    Meta executives eligible for 200% salary bonus under new pay structure

    February 21, 2025
  • 4

    Anthropic’s newly released Claude 3.7 Sonnet can ‘think’ as long as the user wants before giving an answer

    February 25, 2025
  • 5

    Walmart earnings preview: What to expect before Thursday’s opening bell

    February 20, 2025
  • ‘The Value of Others’ Isn’t Especially Valuable

    April 17, 2025
  • 7

    Cramer reveals a sub-sector of technology that can withstand Trump tariffs

    March 1, 2025

Categories

  • Economy (4,442)
  • Editor's Pick (553)
  • Investing (711)
  • Stock (2,795)
  • About us
  • Contact us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions

Copyright © 2025 Portfolioperformancetoday.com All Rights Reserved.

Portfolio Performance Today
  • Investing
  • Stock
  • Economy
  • Editor’s Pick
Portfolio Performance Today
  • Investing
  • Stock
  • Economy
  • Editor’s Pick
Copyright © 2025 Portfolioperformancetoday.com All Rights Reserved.

Read alsox

$93 million in aid to fight malnutrition...

August 8, 2025

Countries that signed Trump’s Gaza Board of...

January 23, 2026

Trump signs off on 10% global tariff,...

February 21, 2026