• Investing
  • Stock
  • Economy
  • Editor’s Pick
Portfolio Performance Today
Stock

JPMorgan seeks to end paying Charlie Javice’s ‘egregious’ $115 million legal bill

by October 26, 2025
by October 26, 2025

JPMorgan Chase & Co. is asking a court to terminate its obligation to pay the legal bills of Charlie Javice, the founder of the college financial aid startup Frank, whose fees have ballooned to over $115 million since she was convicted of defrauding the bank.

A clause in the original contract for JPMorgan’s ill-fated $175 million purchase of Frank has kept the bank liable for Javice’s legal fees.

Now, in a new court filing, the bank is arguing that the bills have become “patently excessive and egregious” and that it should no longer have to pay.

A contractual obligation turns into a ‘blank check’

Javice was convicted in March of conspiracy, wire, and bank fraud for tricking JPMorgan into acquiring her company by vastly inflating its number of users.

While she continues to appeal that guilty verdict, JPMorgan has been required to pay for her legal defence, an obligation that has now cost the bank upwards of $115 million for Javice and her co-defendant, Olivier Amar.

“The legal fees sought by Charlie Javice and Olivier Amar are patently excessive and egregious,” a JPMorgan spokesperson, Pablo Rodriguez, told Business Insider in a statement. 

We look forward to sharing details of this abuse with the court in coming weeks.

A ‘shocking’ and ‘unprecedented’ legal bill

In its Friday filing, the bank’s lawyers stated that JPMorgan has already advanced $60.1 million to Javice alone for her criminal defense, an amount they described as “unprecedented and shocking” and one that has “exceeded any semblance of reasonableness.”

The bank further argued that Javice has “unreasonably” hired five different law firms for her defense, a move it claims is “necessarily overlapping, duplicative, and excessive.” 

One of those firms alone has received advanced fees and expenses totaling $35.6 million, according to the filing.

The bank’s lawyers contend that Javice and her legal team have treated the advancement process like “a blank check to bill and expense whatever they please” and that JPMorgan will be “irreparably injured” unless the court puts a stop to the “abusive billing.”

Javice’s high-powered legal team includes the prominent attorney Alex Spiro of Quinn Emanuel, who has represented celebrity clients like Elon Musk and Kim Kardashian. 

Business Insider has previously reported that Spiro now commands an hourly rate of $3,000 for his work. Lawyers representing Javice did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

The post JPMorgan seeks to end paying Charlie Javice’s ‘egregious’ $115 million legal bill appeared first on Invezz

0 comment
0
FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

previous post
Netflix stock slips below 200-day MA: here’s why Josh Brown still favours buying
next post
TREY GOWDY: China is misjudging Trump on trade. It may soon be very surprised

Related Posts

IndiGo stock slumps 7%: analysts warn rising costs...

December 8, 2025

LGEN share price analysis: is Legal & General...

December 8, 2025

The AI bubble may burst, but it won’t...

December 8, 2025

Magnum goes solo as Unilever steps out of...

December 8, 2025

How India’s IPO boom is redefining its role...

December 8, 2025

India’s lunar strategy gathers pace as New Delhi...

December 8, 2025

Bitcoin down 3%, S&P 500 up 16%: why...

December 7, 2025

How prediction markets are fixing the ‘information problem’

December 7, 2025

What’s driving the sudden cocoa pile-up at Ivory...

December 7, 2025

Nvidia stock price is a $4.6 trillion bargain:...

December 6, 2025

Stay updated with the latest news, exclusive offers, and special promotions. Sign up now and be the first to know! As a member, you'll receive curated content, insider tips, and invitations to exclusive events. Don't miss out on being part of something special.

By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

Recent Posts

  • Saudi Arabia Didn’t Learn Anything From China’s ‘Ghost Cities’

    December 8, 2025
  • Hashtag Handcuffs: The Global Rise of Online Speech Policing

    December 8, 2025
  • IndiGo stock slumps 7%: analysts warn rising costs could weigh on stock

    December 8, 2025
  • LGEN share price analysis: is Legal & General a good dividend stock?

    December 8, 2025
  • The AI bubble may burst, but it won’t be as bad as many think

    December 8, 2025
  • Magnum goes solo as Unilever steps out of ice cream

    December 8, 2025

Editors’ Picks

  • 1

    Pop Mart reports 188% profit surge, plans aggressive global expansion

    March 26, 2025
  • 2

    Meta executives eligible for 200% salary bonus under new pay structure

    February 21, 2025
  • 3

    New FBI leader Kash Patel tapped to run ATF as acting director

    February 23, 2025
  • 4

    Walmart earnings preview: What to expect before Thursday’s opening bell

    February 20, 2025
  • 5

    Anthropic’s newly released Claude 3.7 Sonnet can ‘think’ as long as the user wants before giving an answer

    February 25, 2025
  • 6

    Cramer reveals a sub-sector of technology that can withstand Trump tariffs

    March 1, 2025
  • 7

    Nvidia’s investment in SoundHound wasn’t all that significant after all

    March 1, 2025

Categories

  • Economy (3,437)
  • Editor's Pick (349)
  • Investing (215)
  • Stock (2,338)
  • About us
  • Contact us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions

Copyright © 2025 Portfolioperformancetoday.com All Rights Reserved.

Portfolio Performance Today
  • Investing
  • Stock
  • Economy
  • Editor’s Pick
Portfolio Performance Today
  • Investing
  • Stock
  • Economy
  • Editor’s Pick
Copyright © 2025 Portfolioperformancetoday.com All Rights Reserved.

Read alsox

Alibaba shares surge 11% in Hong Kong...

February 21, 2025

Indian steel stocks rally after 12% safeguard...

April 22, 2025

Google stock slides after Apple exec links...

May 8, 2025