• Investing
  • Stock
  • Economy
  • Editor’s Pick
Portfolio Performance Today
Stock

GPIQ ETF beats JEPQ by far, but QQQ is a better Nasdaq 100 fund

by October 14, 2025
by October 14, 2025

The Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Premium Income ETF (GPIQ) is having a good year, with inflows rising and its stock jumping to a record high. It peaked at $52.80 on Friday, up sharply from the all-time low of $31.54. This article explores whether the 10% yielding GPIQ ETF is a good buy.

What is the GPIQ ETF and how does it work?

GPIQ ETF is Goldman Sachs’ answer to the JPMorgan Nasdaq 100 Premium Equity ETF (JEPQ), the $30 billion fund. It is a fund that aims to provide investors an exposure to the tech-heavy Nasdaq 100 Index and then generate yield. 

The fund generates a return by embracing a dynamic options ‘overwrite’ strategy, where it sells call options on a varying percentage of the market performance. 

A call option is a transaction that gives investors the right to buy an asset at a certain price before it hits the strike price. A call transaction comes with a premium, which the company uses to pay its shareholders. The premium rises when the market is highly volatile. 

Using the covered call approach has an advantage in that shareholders receive a monthly return in all market conditions. When the Nasdaq 100 Index is flat, its return will be positive as the fund will still make money from the options premium. 

Similarly, the ETF also generates an income when the Nasdaq 100 Index is in a downtrend. However, a major risk happens when the Nasdaq 100 Index rises and crosses the strike price. 

GPIQ vs JEPI vs QQQM ETFs performance

The GPIQ ETF has an expense ratio of 0.29%, which is better than JEPQ’s 0.35%, making it more ideal to investors. The two funds also have a similar dividend yield of about 10%. 

The best way to identify the better ETF to buy is to consider its total return. Data compiled by Seeking Alpha shows that the JEPQ ETF has returned 16% in the last 12 months. In contrast, the GPIQ fund has returned about 20% in the same period.

The same thing is happening this year as the GPIQ ETF has had a total return of 16% compared to JEPQ’s 10%. 

Still, history shows that investing in a generic fund like Invesco QQQ is a better approach than covered call funds like GPIQ and JEPQ. For example, QQQ ETF has had a total return of 18.20% this year, higher than GPIQ and JEPQ’s 16% and 10%. 

QQQ has returned 22% this year, compared to GPIQ and JEPQ’s 20% and 16% and 20%, respectively. As such, while the GPIQ ETF is a better fund than JEPQ. History shows that the pure QQQ ETF is a better fund to own.

The post GPIQ ETF beats JEPQ by far, but QQQ is a better Nasdaq 100 fund appeared first on Invezz

0 comment
0
FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

previous post
Cities that canceled Columbus Day could lose federal funds under new GOP bill
next post
Michelin stock slumps 9% as profit downgrade triggers concerns over 2026 targets

Related Posts

India, France deepen defense cooperation with joint weapon...

November 25, 2025

Super Bank IPO plan puts spotlight on Indonesia...

November 25, 2025

Here’s why the Novo Nordisk stock has crashed...

November 25, 2025

China orders airline pullback as Japan travel demand...

November 25, 2025

SoftBank shares plunge as Google’s Gemini sparks fears...

November 25, 2025

Here’s why the Rolls-Royce share price has moved...

November 24, 2025

US-EU trade accord faces delays amid new US...

November 24, 2025

DBS revises Malaysia bank stake plan as regulatory...

November 24, 2025

Dogecoin gains 5% as Grayscale’s GDOG ETF sparks...

November 24, 2025

Indian Supreme Court clears path for Sandesara brothers...

November 24, 2025

Stay updated with the latest news, exclusive offers, and special promotions. Sign up now and be the first to know! As a member, you'll receive curated content, insider tips, and invitations to exclusive events. Don't miss out on being part of something special.

By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

Recent Posts

  • Business Conditions Monthly September 2025: Data Blackout

    November 25, 2025
  • emnify Advances 6G Innovation Through EU-Funded ORIGAMI Project

    November 25, 2025
  • 6 IoT semiconductor predictions for 2026

    November 25, 2025
  • AIER’s Thanksgiving Index Near All-Time High: Costs Rise Again As Inflation Persists

    November 25, 2025
  • Regulating Yesterday’s Market: When Innovation Moves Faster Than the Law

    November 25, 2025
  • 5G RedCap: Real Deployment Challenges and Benefits for IoT Devices

    November 25, 2025

Editors’ Picks

  • 1

    Pop Mart reports 188% profit surge, plans aggressive global expansion

    March 26, 2025
  • 2

    Meta executives eligible for 200% salary bonus under new pay structure

    February 21, 2025
  • 3

    New FBI leader Kash Patel tapped to run ATF as acting director

    February 23, 2025
  • 4

    Walmart earnings preview: What to expect before Thursday’s opening bell

    February 20, 2025
  • 5

    Anthropic’s newly released Claude 3.7 Sonnet can ‘think’ as long as the user wants before giving an answer

    February 25, 2025
  • 6

    Cramer reveals a sub-sector of technology that can withstand Trump tariffs

    March 1, 2025
  • 7

    Nvidia’s investment in SoundHound wasn’t all that significant after all

    March 1, 2025

Categories

  • Economy (3,334)
  • Editor's Pick (337)
  • Investing (185)
  • Stock (2,252)
  • About us
  • Contact us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions

Copyright © 2025 Portfolioperformancetoday.com All Rights Reserved.

Portfolio Performance Today
  • Investing
  • Stock
  • Economy
  • Editor’s Pick
Portfolio Performance Today
  • Investing
  • Stock
  • Economy
  • Editor’s Pick
Copyright © 2025 Portfolioperformancetoday.com All Rights Reserved.

Read alsox

AMD stock price forecast after crashing to...

March 25, 2025

Panama Canal ports at center of CK...

August 14, 2025

European, Asian pharma stocks rally as Trump...

April 3, 2025