• Investing
  • Stock
  • Economy
  • Editor’s Pick
Portfolio Performance Today
Stock

GPIQ ETF beats JEPQ by far, but QQQ is a better Nasdaq 100 fund

by October 14, 2025
by October 14, 2025

The Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Premium Income ETF (GPIQ) is having a good year, with inflows rising and its stock jumping to a record high. It peaked at $52.80 on Friday, up sharply from the all-time low of $31.54. This article explores whether the 10% yielding GPIQ ETF is a good buy.

What is the GPIQ ETF and how does it work?

GPIQ ETF is Goldman Sachs’ answer to the JPMorgan Nasdaq 100 Premium Equity ETF (JEPQ), the $30 billion fund. It is a fund that aims to provide investors an exposure to the tech-heavy Nasdaq 100 Index and then generate yield. 

The fund generates a return by embracing a dynamic options ‘overwrite’ strategy, where it sells call options on a varying percentage of the market performance. 

A call option is a transaction that gives investors the right to buy an asset at a certain price before it hits the strike price. A call transaction comes with a premium, which the company uses to pay its shareholders. The premium rises when the market is highly volatile. 

Using the covered call approach has an advantage in that shareholders receive a monthly return in all market conditions. When the Nasdaq 100 Index is flat, its return will be positive as the fund will still make money from the options premium. 

Similarly, the ETF also generates an income when the Nasdaq 100 Index is in a downtrend. However, a major risk happens when the Nasdaq 100 Index rises and crosses the strike price. 

GPIQ vs JEPI vs QQQM ETFs performance

The GPIQ ETF has an expense ratio of 0.29%, which is better than JEPQ’s 0.35%, making it more ideal to investors. The two funds also have a similar dividend yield of about 10%. 

The best way to identify the better ETF to buy is to consider its total return. Data compiled by Seeking Alpha shows that the JEPQ ETF has returned 16% in the last 12 months. In contrast, the GPIQ fund has returned about 20% in the same period.

The same thing is happening this year as the GPIQ ETF has had a total return of 16% compared to JEPQ’s 10%. 

Still, history shows that investing in a generic fund like Invesco QQQ is a better approach than covered call funds like GPIQ and JEPQ. For example, QQQ ETF has had a total return of 18.20% this year, higher than GPIQ and JEPQ’s 16% and 10%. 

QQQ has returned 22% this year, compared to GPIQ and JEPQ’s 20% and 16% and 20%, respectively. As such, while the GPIQ ETF is a better fund than JEPQ. History shows that the pure QQQ ETF is a better fund to own.

The post GPIQ ETF beats JEPQ by far, but QQQ is a better Nasdaq 100 fund appeared first on Invezz

0 comment
0
FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

previous post
‘It took 3,000 years’: Trump heralds ‘golden age of the Middle East’ in speeches to Arab leaders, Israel
next post
Michelin stock slumps 9% as profit downgrade triggers concerns over 2026 targets

Related Posts

Morning Brief: Asian stocks slide; Trump threatens 50%...

January 30, 2026

Exxon Q4 preview: Crude price headwinds to hit...

January 30, 2026

Analyst estimates predict revenue and EPS dip for...

January 30, 2026

Gold slumps 3%, but set for its strongest...

January 30, 2026

Top FTSE 100 Index shares to watch: BT...

January 30, 2026

Top CAC 40 Index shares to watch: BNP...

January 30, 2026

Apple flags rising memory costs as AI strains...

January 30, 2026

Morning brief: OpenAI eyes massive funding as copper...

January 29, 2026

Gold surges past $5,600 as geopolitics and weak...

January 29, 2026

How SK Hynix leapfrogged Samsung in the AI-driven...

January 29, 2026

Stay updated with the latest news, exclusive offers, and special promotions. Sign up now and be the first to know! As a member, you'll receive curated content, insider tips, and invitations to exclusive events. Don't miss out on being part of something special.

By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

Recent Posts

  • The Fed Takes a Wait-and-See Approach

    January 30, 2026
  • Rent Money Isn’t Wasted — It Buys Protection from Big Risk

    January 30, 2026
  • How Does Your State Rank on This Economic Freedom Index?

    January 30, 2026
  • Morning Brief: Asian stocks slide; Trump threatens 50% Canada tariffs

    January 30, 2026
  • Exxon Q4 preview: Crude price headwinds to hit Exxon’s upstream earnings

    January 30, 2026
  • Analyst estimates predict revenue and EPS dip for Chevron’s critical Q4 result

    January 30, 2026

Editors’ Picks

  • 1

    Pop Mart reports 188% profit surge, plans aggressive global expansion

    March 26, 2025
  • 2

    Meta executives eligible for 200% salary bonus under new pay structure

    February 21, 2025
  • 3

    New FBI leader Kash Patel tapped to run ATF as acting director

    February 23, 2025
  • 4

    Anthropic’s newly released Claude 3.7 Sonnet can ‘think’ as long as the user wants before giving an answer

    February 25, 2025
  • 5

    Walmart earnings preview: What to expect before Thursday’s opening bell

    February 20, 2025
  • ‘The Value of Others’ Isn’t Especially Valuable

    April 17, 2025
  • 7

    Cramer reveals a sub-sector of technology that can withstand Trump tariffs

    March 1, 2025

Categories

  • Economy (3,976)
  • Editor's Pick (434)
  • Investing (457)
  • Stock (2,654)
  • About us
  • Contact us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions

Copyright © 2025 Portfolioperformancetoday.com All Rights Reserved.

Portfolio Performance Today
  • Investing
  • Stock
  • Economy
  • Editor’s Pick
Portfolio Performance Today
  • Investing
  • Stock
  • Economy
  • Editor’s Pick
Copyright © 2025 Portfolioperformancetoday.com All Rights Reserved.

Read alsox

US stocks could still rally 20% in...

May 31, 2025

CAC 40 Index top gainers and laggards...

December 30, 2025

Looking back at 2025: the $3.2 billion...

December 28, 2025