• Investing
  • Stock
  • Economy
  • Editor’s Pick
Portfolio Performance Today
Economy

Rand Paul clashes with top Democrat over CDC pushing vaccines on infants

by September 18, 2025
by September 18, 2025

Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., clashed with Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., and former CDC Director Susan Monarez over recommending vaccines for infants on Wednesday.

The back-and-forth arose during a Senate hearing on Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s decision to oust Monarez last month. Monarez claims she was forced out for refusing to fire individuals responsible for the CDC’s vaccine recommendations, arguing there is no scientific support for removing certain vaccines from the list.

Paul sought to turn the tables on the former official during his questioning.

‘When we’re discussing the science here, we have to discuss what is the science in favor of giving the vaccine to a 6-month-old, and what are the benefits from that? And there is no benefit of hospitalization or death. And then what would the risks of that vaccine be? We have large population studies of the risks of the vaccine in younger people,’ Paul said.

‘You won’t fire the people who are saying we have to vaccinate our kids at 6 months of age. That’s who you refused to fire,’ he pressed.

‘That assertion is not commensurate with the experience that I had with the individuals who were identified to be fired,’ Monarez replied as Paul cut her off.

‘Did any of the people you refused to fire,’ Paul began before Sanders then interjected himself: ‘She’s about to answer the question.’

Paul then argued that ‘we should’ remove recommendations that infants receive the COVID-19 vaccine and others that he said are not relevant for children.

‘What is the medical reason to give a Hepatitis-B vaccine to a newborn whose mom has no Hepatitis?’ Paul asked.

Sanders then interjected again as Paul spoke over Monarez, who did not directly answer the question.

‘You had your time Bernie, I’ve got mine,’ Paul said testily before turning back to Monarez. ‘What is the medical, scientific reason and proof for giving a newborn a Hepatitis-B vaccine if the mom is Hep-B negative?’

Monarez again refused to answer the question directly, and Paul argued that ‘the burden should be on you’ to prove that vaccines recommended for infants are actually helpful.

‘You want to make all kids take this? The burden is upon you,’ he said.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

0 comment
0
FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

previous post
Obama calls Charlie Kirk’s death ‘horrific,’ blames Trump for fueling division
next post
FLASHBACK: Mamdani labeled Kirk a ‘far-right extremist’ who should be canceled from speaking in NYC

Related Posts

Hashtag Handcuffs: The Global Rise of Online Speech...

December 8, 2025

Saudi Arabia Didn’t Learn Anything From China’s ‘Ghost...

December 8, 2025

Chechen leader threatens Zelenskyy amid drone strike, echoes...

December 8, 2025

Trump’s Kennedy Center Honors overhaul delivers star-studded lineup,...

December 8, 2025

Congress unveils $900B defense bill targeting China with...

December 8, 2025

Teenage cancer patient’s final fight becomes law as...

December 7, 2025

State-level AI rules survive — for now —...

December 7, 2025

DAVID MARCUS: Trump’s aggression toward Venezuela a warning...

December 7, 2025

Rosie O’Donnell’s Trump obsession continues unabated from Ireland...

December 7, 2025

Judge rules evidence linked to James Comey’s ally...

December 7, 2025

Stay updated with the latest news, exclusive offers, and special promotions. Sign up now and be the first to know! As a member, you'll receive curated content, insider tips, and invitations to exclusive events. Don't miss out on being part of something special.

By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

Recent Posts

  • Why Trump-branded investments are collapsing, and what the market is pricing in now 

    December 8, 2025
  • What’s driving the sudden cocoa pile-up at Ivory Coast’s busiest ports?

    December 8, 2025
  • Apple stock under pressure after major executive departures: what it means for AAPL’s AI roadmap

    December 8, 2025
  • Morning brief: Trump flags Netflix–WBD deal concerns; Japan’s GDP contracts

    December 8, 2025
  • India moves to open nuclear power sector to private investment

    December 8, 2025
  • IndiGo stock slumps 7%: analysts warn rising costs could weigh on stock

    December 8, 2025

Editors’ Picks

  • 1

    Pop Mart reports 188% profit surge, plans aggressive global expansion

    March 26, 2025
  • 2

    Meta executives eligible for 200% salary bonus under new pay structure

    February 21, 2025
  • 3

    New FBI leader Kash Patel tapped to run ATF as acting director

    February 23, 2025
  • 4

    Walmart earnings preview: What to expect before Thursday’s opening bell

    February 20, 2025
  • 5

    Anthropic’s newly released Claude 3.7 Sonnet can ‘think’ as long as the user wants before giving an answer

    February 25, 2025
  • 6

    Cramer reveals a sub-sector of technology that can withstand Trump tariffs

    March 1, 2025
  • 7

    Nvidia’s investment in SoundHound wasn’t all that significant after all

    March 1, 2025

Categories

  • Economy (3,437)
  • Editor's Pick (350)
  • Investing (225)
  • Stock (2,338)
  • About us
  • Contact us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions

Copyright © 2025 Portfolioperformancetoday.com All Rights Reserved.

Portfolio Performance Today
  • Investing
  • Stock
  • Economy
  • Editor’s Pick
Portfolio Performance Today
  • Investing
  • Stock
  • Economy
  • Editor’s Pick
Copyright © 2025 Portfolioperformancetoday.com All Rights Reserved.

Read alsox

Kamala Harris reveals what Biden told her...

September 21, 2025

Epstein files debacle spurs new interest in...

March 1, 2025

Can Russia Outlaw Childlessness?

July 3, 2025