• Investing
  • Stock
  • Economy
  • Editor’s Pick
Portfolio Performance Today
Economy

Powell Pivots, Fed Cuts Rates as Jobs Market Weakens

by September 18, 2025
by September 18, 2025

The Federal Reserve lowered its federal funds rate target range by 25 basis points, to 4.00–4.25 percent, on Wednesday. Before the decision, it had held rates steady since December 2024. The move came as no surprise to market participants, who had widely anticipated a cut in light of the weakening labor market.

At the post-meeting press conference, Fed Chair Jerome Powell stressed challenges on both sides of the Fed’s dual mandate. Unemployment, while still low, has edged higher in recent months, and job growth has slowed with risks of further weakening. At the same time, inflation has picked up again and remains above the Fed’s 2-percent target.

Powell noted that real Gross Domestic Product growth slowed to 1.5 percent in the first half of the year, reflecting weaker consumer spending. Business investment, however, has risen since last year. The median committee member raised its 2025 real GDP growth projection to 1.6 percent, up from 1.4 percent in June.

Powell reported that wage growth is moderating, but still outpacing inflation. Job growth, however, has slowed sharply, reflecting lower labor force participation, reduced immigration, and weakening labor demand. At present, job gains are too modest to hold the unemployment rate steady. Even so, the median committee member left its 2025 unemployment projection unchanged at 4.5 percent.

Powell acknowledged that inflation remains above target and has picked up in recent months. He observed that expectations have drifted higher this year, reflecting concerns about the lingering effects of tariffs. Long-run expectations remain anchored near 2 percent, though. The median committee member continues to project 3.0 percent inflation in 2025.

Echoing past remarks, Powell underscored the uncertainty surrounding tariffs and their effect on inflation. While tariffs have pushed some prices higher, the broader impact remains unclear. He explained that tariff-driven inflation should be short-lived — what I’ve described as a one-time shift in the price level — but cautioned that the effect could prove more persistent if prices adjust slowly.

Powell explained that rising inflation risks and a weakening labor market have put the Fed’s dual mandate in tension. The committee judged that employment risks have intensified since its last meeting, making a rate cut appropriate. He also cast the move as a step toward a neutral stance, acknowledging that policy is still tight. 

Judging by their projections, everyone on the committee appears to agree that the current federal funds rate target range remains above the longer-run neutral rate. The median committee member thinks the current target range is at least 100 basis points above neutral. The relevant question, then, is how quickly the FOMC should return monetary policy to a neutral stance.

Some FOMC members prefer a wait-and-see approach, at least in the near term. According to the Fed’s dot-plot, seven committee members indicated the federal funds rate target range should be no lower by the end of the year. But most believe additional easing will be warranted this year. Twelve committee members said the federal funds rate target range should be at least 25 basis points lower, and ten of those thought it should be at least 50 basis points lower. The median member now projects the midpoint of the federal funds rate target range at 3.6 percent following the December meeting, having previously projected it would decline to just 3.9 percent this year.

One committee member, most likely the newly-appointed Governor Stephen Miran, thinks the FOMC should take a much more aggressive approach toward a return to neutral. That participant indicated the federal funds rate should be between 2.75 and 3.0 percent by the end of the year. Miran dissented from this week’s decision, preferring a deeper, 50-basis-point cut.

Taken together, Powell’s comments reflected a clear break from his past remarks about the health of the labor market and broader economy. With unemployment risks now taking center stage, the Fed has opened the door to further rate cuts, even as inflation remains above target. The path ahead will hinge on whether the recent weakness in the labor market deepens — and whether longer term inflation expectations remain anchored near the Fed’s target.

0 comment
0
FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

previous post
How Do Communities Form? Exploring ‘Social Philosophers’
next post
SCOOP: Ilhan Omar hit with House Ethics complaint over response to Charlie Kirk’s assassination

Related Posts

Why California Is Bleeding Tech Jobs — Decline...

January 9, 2026

Are Free Traders Materialistic — or Are Protectionists?

January 9, 2026

JD Vance announces multi-state fraud task force in...

January 9, 2026

Trump calls for $1.5T defense budget to build...

January 9, 2026

Trump blasts GOP war powers defectors, says they...

January 9, 2026

Trump admin reportedly considers paying each Greenland resident...

January 9, 2026

National security experts sound alarm over CCP-linked land...

January 9, 2026

House passes nearly $180B funding package after conservative...

January 9, 2026

Dozens of House Republicans defy Trump, join Democrats...

January 9, 2026

European allies working on plan if US acts...

January 9, 2026

Stay updated with the latest news, exclusive offers, and special promotions. Sign up now and be the first to know! As a member, you'll receive curated content, insider tips, and invitations to exclusive events. Don't miss out on being part of something special.

By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

Recent Posts

  • Are Free Traders Materialistic — or Are Protectionists?

    January 9, 2026
  • Why California Is Bleeding Tech Jobs — Decline Is a Policy Choice

    January 9, 2026
  • HSBC expects gold to hit $5,050/oz in 2026 before sharp correction

    January 9, 2026
  • Ondas stock price rally gains steam: Is it still a good buy?

    January 9, 2026
  • Nvidia names Google veteran Alison Wagonfeld as its first CMO

    January 9, 2026
  • Here’s why BAE, Babcock, Rolls-Royce shares are top FTSE 100 risers

    January 9, 2026

Editors’ Picks

  • 1

    Pop Mart reports 188% profit surge, plans aggressive global expansion

    March 26, 2025
  • 2

    Meta executives eligible for 200% salary bonus under new pay structure

    February 21, 2025
  • 3

    New FBI leader Kash Patel tapped to run ATF as acting director

    February 23, 2025
  • 4

    Anthropic’s newly released Claude 3.7 Sonnet can ‘think’ as long as the user wants before giving an answer

    February 25, 2025
  • 5

    Walmart earnings preview: What to expect before Thursday’s opening bell

    February 20, 2025
  • 6

    Cramer reveals a sub-sector of technology that can withstand Trump tariffs

    March 1, 2025
  • 7

    Nvidia’s investment in SoundHound wasn’t all that significant after all

    March 1, 2025

Categories

  • Economy (3,751)
  • Editor's Pick (396)
  • Investing (368)
  • Stock (2,523)
  • About us
  • Contact us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions

Copyright © 2025 Portfolioperformancetoday.com All Rights Reserved.

Portfolio Performance Today
  • Investing
  • Stock
  • Economy
  • Editor’s Pick
Portfolio Performance Today
  • Investing
  • Stock
  • Economy
  • Editor’s Pick
Copyright © 2025 Portfolioperformancetoday.com All Rights Reserved.

Read alsox

The Techno-Industrial Policy Playbook Isn’t Conservative —...

June 23, 2025

Pursuit of Happiness: The Growth of a...

August 1, 2025

State Department warns UK over grooming gang...

November 30, 2025