• Investing
  • Stock
  • Economy
  • Editor’s Pick
Portfolio Performance Today
Economy

Fed Governor’s Labor Market Warning Validated by BLS Revision

by August 5, 2025
by August 5, 2025

Last week, the Bureau of Labor Statistics issued sharp downward revisions to its job growth estimates for May and June. May’s gain was cut by 125,000, from +144,000 to just +19,000. June’s was reduced by 133,000, leaving a meager +14,000 jobs added. Combined with July’s weak initial estimate of 73,000, the data paint a sobering picture of a labor market losing momentum.

The revisions came just days after the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) voted to hold the Fed’s policy rate steady. At the press conference following the meeting, Chair Jerome Powell supported the decision, in part, by citing what he described as continued strength in the labor market — a point he has emphasized repeatedly in recent months.

But not everyone on the Committee agreed.

Fed Governor Christopher Waller — one of two FOMC members who dissented from the decision to hold last week — has been arguing for some time that the Fed should begin cutting its policy rate. In a speech delivered a few weeks before the July meeting, he warned that the initial labor market data for May and June might be overstating the economy’s strength and flagged the risk of downward revisions. As he explained:

A pattern in data revisions in recent years tells us that the private payroll data are being overestimated and will be revised down significantly when the benchmark revision occurs in early 2026. Accounting for the anticipated revision to the level of employment in March 2025 and extrapolating forward, private-sector employment gains last month [June] were much closer to zero. This is why I say private-sector payroll gains are near stall speed and flashing red.

He also made clear that waiting for the labor market to visibly weaken before easing would be a mistake. The risk, he explained, is that the Fed could once again fall behind the curve — just as it did in the aftermath of the pandemic. But this time, it would err in the opposite direction: keeping policy too tight for too long:

If the slowing of economic and employment growth were to accelerate and warrant moving toward a more neutral setting more quickly, then waiting until September or even later in the year would risk us falling behind the curve of appropriate policy.

Unsurprisingly, labor market concerns were central to Waller’s dissent from the Committee’s decision to hold rates steady. Following the FOMC meeting, he reiterated the case for easing:

[W]hile the labor market looks fine on the surface, once we account for expected data revisions, private-sector payroll growth is near stall speed, and other data suggest that the downside risks to the labor market have increased. With underlying inflation near target and the upside risks to inflation limited, we should not wait until the labor market deteriorates before we cut the policy rate.

It seems the market is finally catching up to Waller’s view. Following the BLS revisions, futures pricing shifted sharply. The implied probability of a rate cut in September now stands at 92 percent, up from just 46 percent on July 30, the day of the FOMC meeting. This dramatic swing underscores just how significant the BLS revisions were, and what they reveal about the true state of the economy.

As I argued recently, the Fed may be inadvertently tightening monetary policy despite taking no overt action. If tariffs and broader economic uncertainty are weighing on productivity and investment, they are also likely pulling down the neutral rate of interest. In that case, holding the federal funds rate constant — as the Fed has done since December — means that real interest rates are rising relative to the neutral rate. In short, monetary policy may be far from neutral despite the Fed’s inaction. The recent labor market revisions suggest that this is indeed the case.

Now that we have better data, it is clear that Waller’s concerns were justified. The sharp downward revisions to job growth in May and June confirm that the labor market has been slowing for months. In short, his warning that the Fed risked falling behind the curve by waiting now looks increasingly prescient. The question now is whether his colleagues on the FOMC will recognize the need to change course before it’s too late.

0 comment
0
FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

previous post
How Unusual Was July’s Jobs Report Revision? Here’s What My Analysis Found

Related Posts

How Unusual Was July’s Jobs Report Revision? Here’s...

August 5, 2025

No Return to the Old Balance Sheet, Fed’s...

August 5, 2025

‘1619 Project’ is Brazen Deception in the Service...

August 5, 2025

Tariffs Tanked GDP, Not Imports

August 5, 2025

Tariffs Tanked GDP, Not Imports

August 5, 2025

‘1619 Project’ is Brazen Deception in the Service...

August 5, 2025

GOP memo preps House Republicans to tout Trump’s...

August 5, 2025

Trump confirms 2 nuclear submarines are ‘in the...

August 5, 2025

Cornyn takes swing at James, Schiff with new...

August 5, 2025

DOJ launching grand jury investigation into Russiagate conspiracy...

August 5, 2025

Stay updated with the latest news, exclusive offers, and special promotions. Sign up now and be the first to know! As a member, you'll receive curated content, insider tips, and invitations to exclusive events. Don't miss out on being part of something special.

By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

Recent Posts

  • Fed Governor’s Labor Market Warning Validated by BLS Revision

    August 5, 2025
  • How Unusual Was July’s Jobs Report Revision? Here’s What My Analysis Found

    August 5, 2025
  • IFCO and Identiv Form Strategic Partnership to Enhance Digital Traceability in the Global Fresh Grocery Supply Chain

    August 5, 2025
  • No Return to the Old Balance Sheet, Fed’s Waller Says

    August 5, 2025
  • ‘1619 Project’ is Brazen Deception in the Service of Statism

    August 5, 2025
  • Tariffs Tanked GDP, Not Imports

    August 5, 2025

Editors’ Picks

  • 1

    Meta executives eligible for 200% salary bonus under new pay structure

    February 21, 2025
  • 2

    Walmart earnings preview: What to expect before Thursday’s opening bell

    February 20, 2025
  • 3

    New FBI leader Kash Patel tapped to run ATF as acting director

    February 23, 2025
  • 4

    Anthropic’s newly released Claude 3.7 Sonnet can ‘think’ as long as the user wants before giving an answer

    February 25, 2025
  • 5

    Nvidia’s investment in SoundHound wasn’t all that significant after all

    March 1, 2025
  • 6

    Cramer reveals a sub-sector of technology that can withstand Trump tariffs

    March 1, 2025
  • 7

    Elon Musk says federal employees must fill out productivity reports or resign

    February 23, 2025

Categories

  • Economy (2,085)
  • Editor's Pick (206)
  • Investing (185)
  • Stock (1,394)
  • About us
  • Contact us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions

Copyright © 2025 Portfolioperformancetoday.com All Rights Reserved.

Portfolio Performance Today
  • Investing
  • Stock
  • Economy
  • Editor’s Pick
Portfolio Performance Today
  • Investing
  • Stock
  • Economy
  • Editor’s Pick
Copyright © 2025 Portfolioperformancetoday.com All Rights Reserved.

Read alsox

Trump urges House Republicans to ignore ‘grandstanders’...

July 2, 2025

Trump’s goodwill tested as Putin ignores peace...

April 26, 2025

Bipartisan senators push tougher penalties for foreign-backed...

April 17, 2025