• Investing
  • Stock
  • Economy
  • Editor’s Pick
Portfolio Performance Today
Economy

Kevin Hassett ‘very, very confident’ courts will back Trump’s tariffs amid legal setback

by June 2, 2025
by June 2, 2025

White House Economic Council Director Kevin Hassett says he remains ‘very, very confident’ that courts will support President Donald Trump’s tariff agenda.

Hassett made the statement during a Sunday morning appearance on ABC’s ‘This Week,’ telling host George Stephanopoulos that the White House still expects ‘Plan A’ to work out.

‘And so we’re very thrilled. We are very confident that the judges would uphold this law. And so I think that that’s Plan A, and we’re very, very confident that Plan A is all we’re ever going to need,’ Hassett said.

‘But if, for some reason, some judge were to say that it’s not a national emergency when more Americans die from fentanyl than have ever died in all American wars combined, that’s not an emergency that the president has authority over – if that ludicrous statement is made by a judge somewhere, then we’ll have other alternatives that we can pursue as well to make sure that we make American trade fair again,’ he added.

Hassett’s appearance comes after a federal court struck down Trump’s tariffs in a ruling last week, only for an appeals court to issue a temporary stay protecting the tariffs during litigation.

The appeals court ruling paused a decision by the U.S. Court of International Trade (CIT), thus allowing Trump to continue to enact the 10% baseline tariff and the so-called ‘reciprocal tariffs’ that he announced April 2 under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, or IEEPA. 

The CIT had ruled unanimously to block the tariffs the day before.

Members of the three-judge panel who were appointed by Trump, former President Barack Obama and former President Ronald Reagan, ruled unanimously that Trump had overstepped his authority under IEEPA.

They noted that, as commander in chief, Trump does not have ‘unbounded authority’ to impose tariffs under the emergency law.

For now, the burden of proof shifts to the government, which must convince the court it will suffer ‘irreparable harm’ if the injunction remains in place, a high legal standard the Trump administration must meet.

Fox News’ Breanne Deppisch contributed to this report

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

0 comment
0
FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

previous post
Rand Paul says he would support ‘big, beautiful bill’ if debt ceiling hike removed
next post
House Dems’ campaign chair says her party’s ‘on offense’ in 2026 battle to win back majority from GOP

Related Posts

Hashtag Handcuffs: The Global Rise of Online Speech...

December 8, 2025

Saudi Arabia Didn’t Learn Anything From China’s ‘Ghost...

December 8, 2025

Chechen leader threatens Zelenskyy amid drone strike, echoes...

December 8, 2025

Trump’s Kennedy Center Honors overhaul delivers star-studded lineup,...

December 8, 2025

Congress unveils $900B defense bill targeting China with...

December 8, 2025

Teenage cancer patient’s final fight becomes law as...

December 7, 2025

State-level AI rules survive — for now —...

December 7, 2025

DAVID MARCUS: Trump’s aggression toward Venezuela a warning...

December 7, 2025

Rosie O’Donnell’s Trump obsession continues unabated from Ireland...

December 7, 2025

Judge rules evidence linked to James Comey’s ally...

December 7, 2025

Stay updated with the latest news, exclusive offers, and special promotions. Sign up now and be the first to know! As a member, you'll receive curated content, insider tips, and invitations to exclusive events. Don't miss out on being part of something special.

By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

Recent Posts

  • Saudi Arabia Didn’t Learn Anything From China’s ‘Ghost Cities’

    December 8, 2025
  • Hashtag Handcuffs: The Global Rise of Online Speech Policing

    December 8, 2025
  • IndiGo stock slumps 7%: analysts warn rising costs could weigh on stock

    December 8, 2025
  • LGEN share price analysis: is Legal & General a good dividend stock?

    December 8, 2025
  • The AI bubble may burst, but it won’t be as bad as many think

    December 8, 2025
  • Magnum goes solo as Unilever steps out of ice cream

    December 8, 2025

Editors’ Picks

  • 1

    Pop Mart reports 188% profit surge, plans aggressive global expansion

    March 26, 2025
  • 2

    Meta executives eligible for 200% salary bonus under new pay structure

    February 21, 2025
  • 3

    New FBI leader Kash Patel tapped to run ATF as acting director

    February 23, 2025
  • 4

    Walmart earnings preview: What to expect before Thursday’s opening bell

    February 20, 2025
  • 5

    Anthropic’s newly released Claude 3.7 Sonnet can ‘think’ as long as the user wants before giving an answer

    February 25, 2025
  • 6

    Cramer reveals a sub-sector of technology that can withstand Trump tariffs

    March 1, 2025
  • 7

    Nvidia’s investment in SoundHound wasn’t all that significant after all

    March 1, 2025

Categories

  • Economy (3,437)
  • Editor's Pick (349)
  • Investing (215)
  • Stock (2,338)
  • About us
  • Contact us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions

Copyright © 2025 Portfolioperformancetoday.com All Rights Reserved.

Portfolio Performance Today
  • Investing
  • Stock
  • Economy
  • Editor’s Pick
Portfolio Performance Today
  • Investing
  • Stock
  • Economy
  • Editor’s Pick
Copyright © 2025 Portfolioperformancetoday.com All Rights Reserved.

Read alsox

House Democrats accuse Trump of trying to...

October 29, 2025

Senate hopes to blow through procedural hurdles...

November 11, 2025

Rand Paul says he would support ‘big,...

June 2, 2025