• Investing
  • Stock
  • Economy
  • Editor’s Pick
Portfolio Performance Today
Economy

A US judge partially blocked Trump’s election integrity order from taking force. Is that legal?

by May 3, 2025
by May 3, 2025

Last month, a federal judge in Washington, D.C., blocked key parts of President Donald Trump’s executive order on election integrity – a move that underscores how deeply divided the country remains over what ‘election integrity’ really means..

Though the executive order Trump signed was titled, ‘Preserving and Protecting the Integrity of American Elections,’ the Democratic National Party (DNC), which led a group of plaintiffs in challenging the order in federal court, argued that it was an attempt to encroach on elections and disenfranchise voters. 

In the end, both sides won out – sort of, and at least for now.  Here’s what to know about the case in question:

Why did the judge block a portion of the order?

U.S. District Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly ultimately left in place three key parts of Trump’s executive order, including a provision requiring states not to count mail-in ballots received after Election Day, in a partial victory for the Trump administration. 

But she sided with Democratic plaintiffs in blocking, for now, both a new proof-of-citizenship requirement for federal voter registration forms and a provision directing election officials to verify the citizenship of would-be voters.

Does she have the authority to do so? 

Unequivocally, yes. That’s exactly the problem modern presidents face when trying to make lasting policy changes through executive orders – a tactic increasingly favored by both Democrats and Republicans.

It’s a risky way to govern for two reasons. The first is that these orders can just as easily be overturned by the next commander-in-chief (as has been on display under the last four administrations). 

They also risk being halted in federal courts, where U.S. judges are explicitly tasked with serving as a check on the president, and are free to pause or halt such orders from taking force, should they determine they are outside the scope of the executive branch’s authorities. 

That also doesn’t mean that district courts need to have the final say on the matter.

Kollar-Kotelly stressed last month that voter registration laws and the ability to regulate elections are set by Congress and by individual states, not the executive branch.

Both states and Congress can pass laws so long as they do not ‘needlessly impose’ an undue burden on voters under the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. 

But the executive branch, which does not share in these abilities to make and pass election-related laws, is not entitled to the same standard of legal review, according to the judge. 

‘Our Constitution entrusts Congress and the States – not the President – with the authority to regulate federal elections,’ Kollar-Kotelly said in her ruling.

Next steps

The Trump administration is, of course, free to appeal the decision to higher courts, should it choose to do so. 

‘President Trump will keep fighting for election integrity, despite Democrat objections that reveal their disdain for commonsense safeguards like verifying citizenship,’ White House spokesperson Harrison Fields said in response to the ruling last month.

But its next steps remain unclear. To date, the administration has not appealed the matter, and officials have not said definitively whether they plan to do so.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

0 comment
0
FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

previous post
Trump’s interior chief to unleash Gulf drilling with major rule change
next post
Xpeng EV deliveries soar 273% in April; BYD leads with over 370,000 units sold

Related Posts

No Return to the Old Balance Sheet, Fed’s...

August 4, 2025

China’s Disappearing CEOs and the Flaw of ‘State...

August 4, 2025

Wall Street Isn’t Daycare: Interns Meet the Real...

August 4, 2025

Wall Street Isn’t Daycare: Interns Meet the Real...

August 4, 2025

China’s Disappearing CEOs and the Flaw of ‘State...

August 4, 2025

Kamala Harris back in national spotlight as James...

August 4, 2025

Trump accuses Senate Democrats of using nominee confirmations...

August 4, 2025

Dr. Oz touts investment in Medicaid: ‘I’m trying...

August 4, 2025

Trump closes week with plans to reposition subs...

August 3, 2025

BROADCAST BIAS: ABC compares Sydney Sweeney ad to...

August 3, 2025

Stay updated with the latest news, exclusive offers, and special promotions. Sign up now and be the first to know! As a member, you'll receive curated content, insider tips, and invitations to exclusive events. Don't miss out on being part of something special.

By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

Recent Posts

  • No Return to the Old Balance Sheet, Fed’s Waller Says

    August 4, 2025
  • China’s Disappearing CEOs and the Flaw of ‘State Capitalism’

    August 4, 2025
  • Wall Street Isn’t Daycare: Interns Meet the Real World

    August 4, 2025
  • Soracom Partners With Intelisys to Expand Advanced IoT Cellular Connectivity for Channel Partners

    August 4, 2025
  • China’s Disappearing CEOs and the Flaw of ‘State Capitalism’

    August 4, 2025
  • Wall Street Isn’t Daycare: Interns Meet the Real World

    August 4, 2025

Editors’ Picks

  • 1

    Meta executives eligible for 200% salary bonus under new pay structure

    February 21, 2025
  • 2

    Walmart earnings preview: What to expect before Thursday’s opening bell

    February 20, 2025
  • 3

    New FBI leader Kash Patel tapped to run ATF as acting director

    February 23, 2025
  • 4

    Anthropic’s newly released Claude 3.7 Sonnet can ‘think’ as long as the user wants before giving an answer

    February 25, 2025
  • 5

    Nvidia’s investment in SoundHound wasn’t all that significant after all

    March 1, 2025
  • 6

    Cramer reveals a sub-sector of technology that can withstand Trump tariffs

    March 1, 2025
  • 7

    Elon Musk says federal employees must fill out productivity reports or resign

    February 23, 2025

Categories

  • Economy (2,073)
  • Editor's Pick (204)
  • Investing (185)
  • Stock (1,384)
  • About us
  • Contact us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions

Copyright © 2025 Portfolioperformancetoday.com All Rights Reserved.

Portfolio Performance Today
  • Investing
  • Stock
  • Economy
  • Editor’s Pick
Portfolio Performance Today
  • Investing
  • Stock
  • Economy
  • Editor’s Pick
Copyright © 2025 Portfolioperformancetoday.com All Rights Reserved.

Read alsox

Bondi vows to ‘protect every religion in...

June 25, 2025

America’s Trade ‘Deficit’ Is a Ringing Endorsement

April 9, 2025

SCOOP: House Republicans request ban on federally...

May 25, 2025