• Investing
  • Stock
  • Economy
  • Editor’s Pick
Portfolio Performance Today
Economy

Did Trump Really ‘Make Showers Great Again’? Not Exactly

by April 24, 2025
by April 24, 2025

President Donald J. Trump recently signed an Executive Order directing the Secretary of Energy to rescind certain restrictions on water pressure established by his predecessors. 

As the White House put it, the president was ending the “Obama-Biden war on water pressure and [making] America’s showers great again.”

This isn’t the final salvo in the decades-long Appliance Wars — nor did the order accomplish what many on social media claim.

I first encountered the Appliance Wars in the 1990s, courtesy of my favorite TV show, Seinfeld. In a memorable episode, Kramer, Jerry, and Newman are all visibly irked (and unkempt) as they wrestle with the newly mandated “low-flow” showers.

“There’s no pressure; I can’t get the shampoo out of my hair!” Kramer laments. “If I don’t have a good shower, I am not myself. I feel weak and ineffectual; I’m not Kramer.”

The scene comes from “The Shower Head,” Season 7, Episode 15, which aired in 1996. I didn’t catch it until a few years later while in college, but even then the episode felt fresh, edgy, and smart. 

What I didn’t know was that the Appliance Wars had already been raging for decades.

The Appliance Wars

On December 22, 1975, President Gerald Ford signed into law the Energy Policy and Conservation Act, which granted the president powers over energy exports. The law included regulatory power over household appliances to increase energy efficiency.

The legislation was a response to the 1970s oil crisis, an event that was exacerbated by price controls imposed by President Richard Nixon. The first energy efficiency regulations under the EPCA focused primarily on items like refrigerators, air conditioners, and water heaters, but over time, the scope of these regulations expanded and became more stringent.

In 1992, the Energy Policy Act amended the EPCA to require stricter efficiency standards for appliances and water efficiency standards, including a rule that mandated lower-flow showerheads that limited outflows to 2.5 gallons of water per minute. 

The federal government’s attempt to save the planet by regulating showerheads seemed common sense to some and absurd to others. For writers at Seinfeld, it was clearly the latter. 

Yet the low-flow showers that Seinfeld mocked were not stringent enough for some. 

In 2010, the Obama Administration reduced the maximum flow of showerheads to 2.0 gallons per minute. Some states have gone further. California, for example, has regulations that limit the maximum flow rate for showerheads to 1.8 gallons (and 1.2 GPM for bath faucets).

Twitter and media were abuzz last week that Trump had “made showers great again,” but his executive order didn’t scrap the federal rule, something the White House’s own statement confirms.

“President Trump is restoring sanity to at least one small part of the federal regulations, returning to the straightforward meaning of ‘showerhead’ from the 1992 energy law, which sets a simple 2.5-gallons-per-minute standard for showers,” the press release stated.

The executive order reversed a complicated Biden rule — it was 13,000 words, according to the White House — on the definition of the word “showerhead.” What it did not do was repeal the 1992 regulation.

‘If Washington Can Regulate Showerheads’

The Trump administration is taking a victory lap for “Making Showers Great Again,” but the federal regulation that inspired “The Shower Head” is still in place — it’s just slightly less stringent than the 2-gallon per minute rule initiated during the Obama presidency. (To be fair, the 2.5 limit is written into the US Code, which cannot be changed with the stroke of a pen.) 

That episode ended with Kramer buying “hot” showerheads off the black market. The episode captured the absurdity of attempting to conserve resources in a top-down fashion. As Kramer pointed out, he couldn’t get clean with the new showerheads, which resulted in him taking longer showers. 

Longer showers are indeed a consequence of lower-flow showerheads, but these are the kind of practical consequences that rule-making bureaucrats rarely consider. We’re supposed to take it on faith that federal regulators know the optimal amount of water each individual requires to live, wash, and flush. They don’t, of course.

The Showerhead Wars are funny because they are a Kafkaesque absurdity. The wars lay bare the stupidity of a soulless bureaucracy that can spend 13,000 words defining the term “showerhead” to make our lives less enjoyable and efficient. 

The joke is ultimately on us. Because if Washington can regulate your showerhead, it can regulate anything — and that’s the problem.

0 comment
0
FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

previous post
Termination Day at the Fed? Probably Not
next post
What Scrooge Effect? Americans Keep Giving, Despite the Welfare State

Related Posts

Europe’s Free Speech Erosion: A Warning for the...

July 18, 2025

No, We Weren’t Ripped Off: Debunking the Myth...

July 18, 2025

Let Americans Buy Cars Online!

July 18, 2025

Unearthed chat sheds light on cozy ties between...

July 18, 2025

Biden-era policy indirectly paying for unaccompanied minors’ abortions...

July 18, 2025

‘Irrelevant’: Senators push back against Vought’s call for...

July 18, 2025

Johnson demands NARA turn over records related to...

July 18, 2025

Not ‘honest’ news organizations: White House defends yanking...

July 18, 2025

Senators push back against Vought’s call for more...

July 18, 2025

State Department says US ‘unequivocally condemns’ Israeli airstrike...

July 18, 2025

Stay updated with the latest news, exclusive offers, and special promotions. Sign up now and be the first to know! As a member, you'll receive curated content, insider tips, and invitations to exclusive events. Don't miss out on being part of something special.

By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

Recent Posts

  • Europe’s Free Speech Erosion: A Warning for the United States

    July 18, 2025
  • Let Americans Buy Cars Online!

    July 18, 2025
  • No, We Weren’t Ripped Off: Debunking the Myth of Trade Victimhood

    July 18, 2025
  • Bridge Alliance and Aeris extend partnership to offer the world’s first fully integrated cellular IoT security solution to APAC enterprises

    July 18, 2025
  • TSMC stock: 3 big reasons why Taiwan Semi’s sinking margins aren’t concerning

    July 18, 2025
  • Top used car stocks that stand to benefit from Trump tariffs

    July 18, 2025

Editors’ Picks

  • 1

    Meta executives eligible for 200% salary bonus under new pay structure

    February 21, 2025
  • 2

    Walmart earnings preview: What to expect before Thursday’s opening bell

    February 20, 2025
  • 3

    New FBI leader Kash Patel tapped to run ATF as acting director

    February 23, 2025
  • 4

    Anthropic’s newly released Claude 3.7 Sonnet can ‘think’ as long as the user wants before giving an answer

    February 25, 2025
  • 5

    Nvidia’s investment in SoundHound wasn’t all that significant after all

    March 1, 2025
  • 6

    Elon Musk says federal employees must fill out productivity reports or resign

    February 23, 2025
  • 7

    Cramer reveals a sub-sector of technology that can withstand Trump tariffs

    March 1, 2025

Categories

  • Economy (1,874)
  • Editor's Pick (185)
  • Investing (185)
  • Stock (1,235)
  • About us
  • Contact us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions

Copyright © 2025 Portfolioperformancetoday.com All Rights Reserved.

Portfolio Performance Today
  • Investing
  • Stock
  • Economy
  • Editor’s Pick
Portfolio Performance Today
  • Investing
  • Stock
  • Economy
  • Editor’s Pick
Copyright © 2025 Portfolioperformancetoday.com All Rights Reserved.

Read alsox

World leaders flock to meet with Trump...

June 26, 2025

Inside US Air Traffic Control: Conflicts of...

May 21, 2025

National security experts raise concerns after Microsoft...

July 16, 2025