• Investing
  • Stock
  • Economy
  • Editor’s Pick
Portfolio Performance Today
Economy

Did Trump Really ‘Make Showers Great Again’? Not Exactly

by April 24, 2025
by April 24, 2025

President Donald J. Trump recently signed an Executive Order directing the Secretary of Energy to rescind certain restrictions on water pressure established by his predecessors. 

As the White House put it, the president was ending the “Obama-Biden war on water pressure and [making] America’s showers great again.”

This isn’t the final salvo in the decades-long Appliance Wars — nor did the order accomplish what many on social media claim.

I first encountered the Appliance Wars in the 1990s, courtesy of my favorite TV show, Seinfeld. In a memorable episode, Kramer, Jerry, and Newman are all visibly irked (and unkempt) as they wrestle with the newly mandated “low-flow” showers.

“There’s no pressure; I can’t get the shampoo out of my hair!” Kramer laments. “If I don’t have a good shower, I am not myself. I feel weak and ineffectual; I’m not Kramer.”

The scene comes from “The Shower Head,” Season 7, Episode 15, which aired in 1996. I didn’t catch it until a few years later while in college, but even then the episode felt fresh, edgy, and smart. 

What I didn’t know was that the Appliance Wars had already been raging for decades.

The Appliance Wars

On December 22, 1975, President Gerald Ford signed into law the Energy Policy and Conservation Act, which granted the president powers over energy exports. The law included regulatory power over household appliances to increase energy efficiency.

The legislation was a response to the 1970s oil crisis, an event that was exacerbated by price controls imposed by President Richard Nixon. The first energy efficiency regulations under the EPCA focused primarily on items like refrigerators, air conditioners, and water heaters, but over time, the scope of these regulations expanded and became more stringent.

In 1992, the Energy Policy Act amended the EPCA to require stricter efficiency standards for appliances and water efficiency standards, including a rule that mandated lower-flow showerheads that limited outflows to 2.5 gallons of water per minute. 

The federal government’s attempt to save the planet by regulating showerheads seemed common sense to some and absurd to others. For writers at Seinfeld, it was clearly the latter. 

Yet the low-flow showers that Seinfeld mocked were not stringent enough for some. 

In 2010, the Obama Administration reduced the maximum flow of showerheads to 2.0 gallons per minute. Some states have gone further. California, for example, has regulations that limit the maximum flow rate for showerheads to 1.8 gallons (and 1.2 GPM for bath faucets).

Twitter and media were abuzz last week that Trump had “made showers great again,” but his executive order didn’t scrap the federal rule, something the White House’s own statement confirms.

“President Trump is restoring sanity to at least one small part of the federal regulations, returning to the straightforward meaning of ‘showerhead’ from the 1992 energy law, which sets a simple 2.5-gallons-per-minute standard for showers,” the press release stated.

The executive order reversed a complicated Biden rule — it was 13,000 words, according to the White House — on the definition of the word “showerhead.” What it did not do was repeal the 1992 regulation.

‘If Washington Can Regulate Showerheads’

The Trump administration is taking a victory lap for “Making Showers Great Again,” but the federal regulation that inspired “The Shower Head” is still in place — it’s just slightly less stringent than the 2-gallon per minute rule initiated during the Obama presidency. (To be fair, the 2.5 limit is written into the US Code, which cannot be changed with the stroke of a pen.) 

That episode ended with Kramer buying “hot” showerheads off the black market. The episode captured the absurdity of attempting to conserve resources in a top-down fashion. As Kramer pointed out, he couldn’t get clean with the new showerheads, which resulted in him taking longer showers. 

Longer showers are indeed a consequence of lower-flow showerheads, but these are the kind of practical consequences that rule-making bureaucrats rarely consider. We’re supposed to take it on faith that federal regulators know the optimal amount of water each individual requires to live, wash, and flush. They don’t, of course.

The Showerhead Wars are funny because they are a Kafkaesque absurdity. The wars lay bare the stupidity of a soulless bureaucracy that can spend 13,000 words defining the term “showerhead” to make our lives less enjoyable and efficient. 

The joke is ultimately on us. Because if Washington can regulate your showerhead, it can regulate anything — and that’s the problem.

0 comment
0
FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

previous post
Indian markets open: Sensex dips, Nifty below 24.3K as India-Pakistan tensions halt rally
next post
What Scrooge Effect? Americans Keep Giving, Despite the Welfare State

Related Posts

Immigration Arrest Quotas Undermine ICE’s Mission

February 9, 2026

Liberty Eroding, Gold Rising: 30 Years of Warning

February 9, 2026

Whispering death: Army’s new M1E3 Abrams tank is...

February 9, 2026

DAVID MARCUS: In rural Virginia, mixed signals for...

February 9, 2026

North Korea executed teens for listening to K-pop,...

February 9, 2026

Iran’s top diplomat says nation’s power lies in...

February 9, 2026

The world’s top nuclear powers have no arsenal...

February 9, 2026

Trump says nuclear talks in Oman were ‘very...

February 8, 2026

Ambassador Mike Waltz lays out ‘America First’ vision...

February 8, 2026

Russia to ‘interrogate’ two suspects in attempted assassination...

February 8, 2026

Stay updated with the latest news, exclusive offers, and special promotions. Sign up now and be the first to know! As a member, you'll receive curated content, insider tips, and invitations to exclusive events. Don't miss out on being part of something special.

By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

Recent Posts

  • Immigration Arrest Quotas Undermine ICE’s Mission

    February 9, 2026
  • Liberty Eroding, Gold Rising: 30 Years of Warning

    February 9, 2026
  • Nikkei 225 Index forecast after Sanae Takaichi landslide win: is it a buy or sell?

    February 9, 2026
  • Gold reclaims $5,000, silver surges 6% as experts say bullish momentum intact

    February 9, 2026
  • Morning brief: Takaichi wins Japan election, Starmer’s chief of staff quits

    February 9, 2026
  • Stellantis stock collapses as bearish setup signals deeper pain

    February 9, 2026

Editors’ Picks

  • 1

    Pop Mart reports 188% profit surge, plans aggressive global expansion

    March 26, 2025
  • 2

    New FBI leader Kash Patel tapped to run ATF as acting director

    February 23, 2025
  • 3

    Meta executives eligible for 200% salary bonus under new pay structure

    February 21, 2025
  • 4

    Anthropic’s newly released Claude 3.7 Sonnet can ‘think’ as long as the user wants before giving an answer

    February 25, 2025
  • 5

    Walmart earnings preview: What to expect before Thursday’s opening bell

    February 20, 2025
  • ‘The Value of Others’ Isn’t Especially Valuable

    April 17, 2025
  • 7

    Cramer reveals a sub-sector of technology that can withstand Trump tariffs

    March 1, 2025

Categories

  • Economy (4,075)
  • Editor's Pick (449)
  • Investing (510)
  • Stock (2,714)
  • About us
  • Contact us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions

Copyright © 2025 Portfolioperformancetoday.com All Rights Reserved.

Portfolio Performance Today
  • Investing
  • Stock
  • Economy
  • Editor’s Pick
Portfolio Performance Today
  • Investing
  • Stock
  • Economy
  • Editor’s Pick
Copyright © 2025 Portfolioperformancetoday.com All Rights Reserved.

Read alsox

Ted Cruz accuses Biden of breaking pardon...

September 10, 2025

New report reveals how Trump admin will...

March 29, 2025

The Hard Truth About the Abolition of...

September 2, 2025