• Investing
  • Stock
  • Economy
  • Editor’s Pick
Portfolio Performance Today
Economy

Was Jackie Robinson a DEI Hire?

by April 5, 2025
by April 5, 2025

Do our current debates over DEI mean that we now have to relitigate all of America’s history? To look at recent headlines, you could be forgiven for thinking so.

Recently, the Air Force was hit with a stunning example of malicious compliance in the wake of President Trump’s executive order banning discriminatory diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs. After the EO resulted in a temporary takedown of educational material on the Tuskegee Airmen, America’s first black fighter pilots, the takedown sparked backlash, including from Sen. Katie Britt (R-AL) and newly-instated Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth, with the material on the Airmen quickly being reinstated. But the brouhaha, unfortunately, injected more racism accusations into an already-fraught discussion about how we talk about this country’s battles against the prejudice of our past. And now another historical figure is getting the magnifying glass of DEI scrutiny: Jackie Robinson.

The Department of Defense took flack for deleting an article highlighting the accomplishments of Robinson, the first African-American Major League Baseball player in the modern era. As per reporting from the Associated Press, the error page on Robinson’s article contained “the letters “dei” added to the URL.” After scrubbing it from the site, the Department reinstated the piece, but the backlash had begun.

Stephen A. Smith blasted the mistake and contended it “was [not] an honest mistake at all.” 

Others argued that Robinson’s story, as the first MLB player to break the color barrier, was a perfect example of why modern DEI programs are necessary.

“In Major League Baseball, Jackie Robinson was the definition of a DEI hire, and that’s why we need [DEI],” sports podcaster Nick Wright said in a video. “The reason DEI policies came to exist was to make sure deserving people from all colors… had a shot.” 

Wright asserts that if one doesn’t believe that Jackie Robinson was a ‘DEI hire,’ then one must believe that the racism-laden system he was forced to confront was synonymous with meritocracy, writing, “If your argument is, ‘when the numbers were literally 98 to 2, white guys to everyone else, that’s when we had a merit-based system,’ then make that argument.” 

The problem is, no serious critic of DEI — and perhaps no serious person — believes that. Jim Crow was not meritocratic. No one with a shred of common sense would look at the color-segregated MLB that Robinson came into and conclude it was completely merit-based. 

Making History

Robinson made history when he took the field for the Brooklyn Dodgers in April 1947 (a year before President Harry S Truman would integrate the American military), sporting the number 42 on the back of a blue-and-white Dodgers jersey. His ascension to the MLB field was fraught with no small amount of controversy. Dodgers manager Leo Durocher notably had to hit back against racist sentiments from Robinson’s teammates: “I do not care if the guy is yellow or black, or has stripes like a f**kin’ zebra. I’m the manager of this team, and I say he plays. What’s more, I say he can make us all rich.” 

Robinson faced tremendous racism in his career from both fellow players and fans (including being arrested in 1944 after refusing to sit in the back of a bus), and yet achieved tremendous success, winning Rookie of the Year in 1947, playing in six World Series (including the 1955 Dodgers championship), and took the National League Most Valuable Player Award in 1949. What, then, does his story have to do with DEI?

Wright contends that Robinson was only able to succeed because the DEI policies of his day gave him a shot… “that’s why such policies exist, and that’s why we’ll defend them.”

Wright’s comments betray a fundamental misunderstanding of DEI. It’s no new insight to point out how modern DEI initiatives are not synonymous with nondiscrimination. The days when the defense of DEI was as simple as “DEI just means not being racist, so stop asking questions” are long gone, buried under strata of genuinely terrible policies enacted in the name of DEI that, in practice, amounted to different treatment based on race. 

Is Jackie Robinson analogous to an IBM employee wondering whether their race puts them on the wrong (or right) end of a recruiting diversity quota? Is Robinson analogous to a PwC applicant waiting to see whether their race makes the cut for ‘underrepresented’ to be eligible for an internship? Is Robinson analogous to a banker in 2020 wondering if Wells Fargo is recruiting them based on merit or simply to fulfill the company’s newly instated diversity quota policy? 

DEI Treats People Unequally

These examples are worlds apart from that of Jackie Robinson. To claim that the overt race-based practices of Major League Baseball in 1947 are remotely equivalent to the workforce and academic space of 2025 is the kind of claim you only get to make when you assume, as Wright does, the premise that you’re arguing: that most modern DEI initiatives tangibly reduce bias and don’t treat people differently based on their race. But right now, we’re looking at a growing mountain of evidence that that’s not the case.

To say that Robinson was a “diversity hire” ignores the fact that he was simply seeking the same opportunity as white ballplayers. While his signing to some extent aligns with DEI principles of racial integration, Robinson’s entry into Major League Baseball was based on his ability and performance, not his immutable characteristics. It was, perhaps tellingly, only his critics who saw such characteristics as defining.

0 comment
0
FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

previous post
IoT connectivity provider 1oT acquires Dutch competitor CheerIoT’s customers
next post
Senate GOP pushes Trump budget framework through after marathon vote series

Related Posts

Trump touts massive fundraising haul since winning 2024...

August 28, 2025

Mike Johnson hits iconic Nashville bar, blasts Dems...

August 28, 2025

Apple expected to roll out texting update that...

August 28, 2025

Cracker Barrel’s logo mea culpa is a start...

August 28, 2025

Trump asks SCOTUS to uphold freeze on billions...

August 28, 2025

White House demands all Gaza hostages return home...

August 28, 2025

Bill Gates met with Trump to talk ‘importance...

August 28, 2025

CDC Director Susan Monarez refuses to be fired...

August 28, 2025

Why Enemies of Liberty Hate Economics

August 27, 2025

Can Latin America’s Superwoman Save Venezuela?

August 27, 2025

Stay updated with the latest news, exclusive offers, and special promotions. Sign up now and be the first to know! As a member, you'll receive curated content, insider tips, and invitations to exclusive events. Don't miss out on being part of something special.

By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

Recent Posts

  • Eseye Solidifies Global IoT Leadership with Leading Position in Brazil’s High-Growth Cellular Connectivity Market

    August 28, 2025
  • Adani Group brings more women leaders into key roles

    August 28, 2025
  • Cambricon stock price surged: here’s why it may crash soon

    August 28, 2025
  • India’s instant delivery race hits $15 billion, but losses exceed $1.4 billion

    August 28, 2025
  • Google to invest $9 billion in Virginia data centres and AI expansion through 2026

    August 28, 2025
  • Europe markets open: Stocks rise as Nvidia earnings beat offsets Tesla’s 40% sales slump

    August 28, 2025

Editors’ Picks

  • 1

    Meta executives eligible for 200% salary bonus under new pay structure

    February 21, 2025
  • 2

    Walmart earnings preview: What to expect before Thursday’s opening bell

    February 20, 2025
  • 3

    New FBI leader Kash Patel tapped to run ATF as acting director

    February 23, 2025
  • 4

    Anthropic’s newly released Claude 3.7 Sonnet can ‘think’ as long as the user wants before giving an answer

    February 25, 2025
  • 5

    Cramer reveals a sub-sector of technology that can withstand Trump tariffs

    March 1, 2025
  • 6

    Nvidia’s investment in SoundHound wasn’t all that significant after all

    March 1, 2025
  • 7

    Elon Musk says federal employees must fill out productivity reports or resign

    February 23, 2025

Categories

  • Economy (2,352)
  • Editor's Pick (227)
  • Investing (185)
  • Stock (1,593)
  • About us
  • Contact us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions

Copyright © 2025 Portfolioperformancetoday.com All Rights Reserved.

Portfolio Performance Today
  • Investing
  • Stock
  • Economy
  • Editor’s Pick
Portfolio Performance Today
  • Investing
  • Stock
  • Economy
  • Editor’s Pick
Copyright © 2025 Portfolioperformancetoday.com All Rights Reserved.

Read alsox

Ukrainian designer predicts Zelenskyy will wear military...

August 18, 2025

Huckabee demands Israel ‘aggressively investigate’ murder of...

July 16, 2025

Why Is Housing So Partisan in the...

June 20, 2025