• Investing
  • Stock
  • Economy
  • Editor’s Pick
Portfolio Performance Today
Economy

White House says it didn’t create a banned word list, leaves language choices up to agencies

by March 19, 2025
by March 19, 2025

The White House does not have a list of banned words that are restricted from use in official documents, and instead charges individual agencies with word choice in government documents, Fox News Digital learned.

Media outlets in recent weeks have promoted reports that the Trump administration has banned hundreds of words from official documents, including words such as ‘diverse’ or ‘LGBTQ’ or ‘unconscious bias.’ 

An administration official told Fox Digital that the White House does not have a list of banned words. Instead, individual agencies hold discretion over word choice in compliance with President Donald Trump’s executive orders. 

Trump has signed 92 executive orders since his inauguration in January, including ones that have targeted diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) initiatives in the public and private sectors, as well as ones addressing transgender issues, such as banning biological men from playing in women’s sports or banning transgender surgical procedures for children. 

A handful of the executive orders rescinded Biden-era policies, such as ending DEI programs that were woven into the fabric of the federal government during his term. 

The New York Times reported that about 250 words were removed from the Trump administration’s lexicon or used with discretion. The list included a handful of words that could defy Trump’s executive orders on trans issues and DEI, including: ‘they/them,’ ‘breastfeed + people,’ ‘antiracist,’ ‘people + uterus’ or ‘confirmation bias.’ 

In February, the White House hit back on a report that Food and Drug Administration officials were instructing scientists to stop using words such as ‘woman,’ ‘disabled’ and ‘elderly’ in external documents, as they were on an alleged FDA list of banned words for the administration. 

A White House official told Reuters in February that the majority of words listed as allegedly banned did not need to be removed from external communications and documents, arguing the agency likely misinterpreted Trump’s executive orders on gender ideology. 

The White House specifically identified words such as ‘gender,’ ‘inclusion,’ ‘identity,’ ‘diversity,’ ‘intersex,’ ‘equity,’ ‘equitable,’ ‘transgender’ and ‘trans’ as ones that do not need to be prohibited in order to comply with Trump’s executive orders, according to Reuters. 

Presidential administrations have a long history of adjusting the language used in their official documents and external communications in an effort to realign the federal government with the administration’s policies and vision for the future. 

The Biden administration, for example, used the phrase ‘birthing people’ instead of ‘mothers’ in a 2022 budget proposal before the phrase — and similar ones such as ‘menstruators’ — were used by other federal officials and agencies. The Obama administration favored the phrase ‘undocumented immigrants’ versus ‘illegal immigrant’ in official text and presidential speeches.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

0 comment
0
FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

previous post
Dominican judge rules in Iowa witness’ favor in missing American student case
next post
Iowa witness held in missing American student case appears in Dominican court

Related Posts

Major Russia-Ukraine prisoner swap is underway, official says

May 24, 2025

SCOOP: House GOP memo highlights Republican wins in...

May 24, 2025

Hundreds of Ukrainian prisoners released in swap with...

May 24, 2025

US and Iran clash over uranium enrichment as...

May 24, 2025

Trump administration plans to overhaul National Security Council,...

May 24, 2025

Trump signs executive orders bolstering nuclear industry, domestic...

May 24, 2025

Satellite images reveal North Korea’s mangled naval destroyer...

May 24, 2025

Why California Gas Prices Are the Highest in...

May 23, 2025

Social Security is Not a Ponzi Scheme, but...

May 23, 2025

Social Security is Not a Ponzi Scheme, but...

May 23, 2025

Stay updated with the latest news, exclusive offers, and special promotions. Sign up now and be the first to know! As a member, you'll receive curated content, insider tips, and invitations to exclusive events. Don't miss out on being part of something special.

By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

Recent Posts

  • How Octopus Energy is betting on AI to drive global expansion via Kraken platform

    May 24, 2025
  • Miningcoop launches AI cloud mining system: best legal Bitcoin platform of 2025

    May 24, 2025
  • Trump threatens Apple with 25% tariffs over foreign iPhone production; shares fall

    May 24, 2025
  • European stocks fall as Trump proposes 50% tariff on EU imports; says talks with them ‘going nowhere’

    May 24, 2025
  • US stocks open in red amid Trump’s new tariff demands

    May 24, 2025
  • Brazilian meat giant JBS clears path for US listing with Dutch-based holding structure

    May 24, 2025

Editors’ Picks

  • 1

    Walmart earnings preview: What to expect before Thursday’s opening bell

    February 20, 2025
  • 2

    Meta executives eligible for 200% salary bonus under new pay structure

    February 21, 2025
  • 3

    New FBI leader Kash Patel tapped to run ATF as acting director

    February 23, 2025
  • 4

    Anthropic’s newly released Claude 3.7 Sonnet can ‘think’ as long as the user wants before giving an answer

    February 25, 2025
  • 5

    Elon Musk says federal employees must fill out productivity reports or resign

    February 23, 2025
  • 6

    Nvidia’s investment in SoundHound wasn’t all that significant after all

    March 1, 2025
  • 7

    Cramer reveals a sub-sector of technology that can withstand Trump tariffs

    March 1, 2025

Categories

  • Economy (1,221)
  • Editor's Pick (129)
  • Investing (165)
  • Stock (775)
  • About us
  • Contact us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions

Copyright © 2025 Portfolioperformancetoday.com All Rights Reserved.

Portfolio Performance Today
  • Investing
  • Stock
  • Economy
  • Editor’s Pick
Portfolio Performance Today
  • Investing
  • Stock
  • Economy
  • Editor’s Pick
Copyright © 2025 Portfolioperformancetoday.com All Rights Reserved.

Read alsox

$3000/Ounce: Why The Oldest Money Just Hit...

March 16, 2025

SCOOP: House to hold hearings next week...

March 25, 2025

Palestinian leader demands Hamas release remaining hostages

April 24, 2025