• Investing
  • Stock
  • Economy
  • Editor’s Pick
Portfolio Performance Today
Economy

White House says it didn’t create a banned word list, leaves language choices up to agencies

by March 19, 2025
by March 19, 2025

The White House does not have a list of banned words that are restricted from use in official documents, and instead charges individual agencies with word choice in government documents, Fox News Digital learned.

Media outlets in recent weeks have promoted reports that the Trump administration has banned hundreds of words from official documents, including words such as ‘diverse’ or ‘LGBTQ’ or ‘unconscious bias.’ 

An administration official told Fox Digital that the White House does not have a list of banned words. Instead, individual agencies hold discretion over word choice in compliance with President Donald Trump’s executive orders. 

Trump has signed 92 executive orders since his inauguration in January, including ones that have targeted diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) initiatives in the public and private sectors, as well as ones addressing transgender issues, such as banning biological men from playing in women’s sports or banning transgender surgical procedures for children. 

A handful of the executive orders rescinded Biden-era policies, such as ending DEI programs that were woven into the fabric of the federal government during his term. 

The New York Times reported that about 250 words were removed from the Trump administration’s lexicon or used with discretion. The list included a handful of words that could defy Trump’s executive orders on trans issues and DEI, including: ‘they/them,’ ‘breastfeed + people,’ ‘antiracist,’ ‘people + uterus’ or ‘confirmation bias.’ 

In February, the White House hit back on a report that Food and Drug Administration officials were instructing scientists to stop using words such as ‘woman,’ ‘disabled’ and ‘elderly’ in external documents, as they were on an alleged FDA list of banned words for the administration. 

A White House official told Reuters in February that the majority of words listed as allegedly banned did not need to be removed from external communications and documents, arguing the agency likely misinterpreted Trump’s executive orders on gender ideology. 

The White House specifically identified words such as ‘gender,’ ‘inclusion,’ ‘identity,’ ‘diversity,’ ‘intersex,’ ‘equity,’ ‘equitable,’ ‘transgender’ and ‘trans’ as ones that do not need to be prohibited in order to comply with Trump’s executive orders, according to Reuters. 

Presidential administrations have a long history of adjusting the language used in their official documents and external communications in an effort to realign the federal government with the administration’s policies and vision for the future. 

The Biden administration, for example, used the phrase ‘birthing people’ instead of ‘mothers’ in a 2022 budget proposal before the phrase — and similar ones such as ‘menstruators’ — were used by other federal officials and agencies. The Obama administration favored the phrase ‘undocumented immigrants’ versus ‘illegal immigrant’ in official text and presidential speeches.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

0 comment
0
FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

previous post
Dominican judge rules in Iowa witness’ favor in missing American student case
next post
Schumer says ‘oligarchs’ keep him up at night, despite his own ties to billionaires

Related Posts

Evergreens and Embers: What the Solstice Teaches Us...

December 25, 2025

Santa The Economic Terrorist

December 25, 2025

Top 5 takeaways from latest Jeffrey Epstein files...

December 25, 2025

MIKE DAVIS: FBI knew Mar-a-Lago raid was illegal,...

December 25, 2025

Here’s how the Cabinet secretaries and their families...

December 25, 2025

DOJ discovers more than 1M potential Epstein records,...

December 25, 2025

Trump-backed candidate Asfura wins Honduras presidential election

December 25, 2025

Christmas Eve jazz concert canceled at Kennedy Center...

December 25, 2025

Nearly 20 states sue HHS over declaration to...

December 25, 2025

Can Zohran Mamdani Force Doctors to Treat Patients?

December 24, 2025

Stay updated with the latest news, exclusive offers, and special promotions. Sign up now and be the first to know! As a member, you'll receive curated content, insider tips, and invitations to exclusive events. Don't miss out on being part of something special.

By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

Recent Posts

  • Why US sanctioned former EU official, 4 others; what it says about transatlantic tech rift

    December 25, 2025
  • GLP-1 weight-loss pills set to reshape US food demand in 2026

    December 25, 2025
  • US stocks hold steady on Christmas Eve as investors watch Santa Claus rally

    December 25, 2025
  • Agios Pharma jumps 15% as FDA expands use of anaemia drug mitapivat

    December 25, 2025
  • Nvidia stock plunges after Intel’s 18A move: what does it mean for AI chips?

    December 25, 2025
  • Commodity wrap: gold, silver prices ease on Christmas Eve; oil heads for steepest drop since 2020

    December 25, 2025

Editors’ Picks

  • 1

    Pop Mart reports 188% profit surge, plans aggressive global expansion

    March 26, 2025
  • 2

    Meta executives eligible for 200% salary bonus under new pay structure

    February 21, 2025
  • 3

    New FBI leader Kash Patel tapped to run ATF as acting director

    February 23, 2025
  • 4

    Walmart earnings preview: What to expect before Thursday’s opening bell

    February 20, 2025
  • 5

    Anthropic’s newly released Claude 3.7 Sonnet can ‘think’ as long as the user wants before giving an answer

    February 25, 2025
  • 6

    Cramer reveals a sub-sector of technology that can withstand Trump tariffs

    March 1, 2025
  • 7

    Nvidia’s investment in SoundHound wasn’t all that significant after all

    March 1, 2025

Categories

  • Economy (3,611)
  • Editor's Pick (372)
  • Investing (317)
  • Stock (2,432)
  • About us
  • Contact us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions

Copyright © 2025 Portfolioperformancetoday.com All Rights Reserved.

Portfolio Performance Today
  • Investing
  • Stock
  • Economy
  • Editor’s Pick
Portfolio Performance Today
  • Investing
  • Stock
  • Economy
  • Editor’s Pick
Copyright © 2025 Portfolioperformancetoday.com All Rights Reserved.

Read alsox

Trump’s Handwritten Note to Powell: Lower Rates...

July 1, 2025

Vance issues ultimatum to Russia, Ukraine on...

April 24, 2025

Homesick GOP senators mull throwing out the...

August 1, 2025