• Investing
  • Stock
  • Economy
  • Editor’s Pick
Portfolio Performance Today
Stock

Citigroup’s $81 trillion blunder: how a ‘fat finger’ mistake was caught

by March 1, 2025
by March 1, 2025

Citigroup narrowly avoided what could have been one of the largest banking blunders in history after it mistakenly credited a client’s account with $81 trillion instead of the intended $280.

The Financial Times reported that the error was detected only after two employees overlooked it, with a third employee catching and correcting the mistake 90 minutes later.

Fortunately, no funds left the bank.

The US banking giant disclosed the incident to financial regulators, including the Federal Reserve and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, as part of its internal reporting procedures.

A near-impossible transaction

A transaction of $81 trillion is so vast that it would be unlikely to pass through any banking system without immediate red flags.

The sheer scale of the error was highlighted by comparisons with global financial benchmarks—the total US stock market was valued at $62 trillion at the end of 2024, while global wealth stood at approximately $450 trillion, according to UBS.

To put it into perspective, the erroneously credited sum would have been enough to buy all major US technology companies at a premium or acquire the assets of Elon Musk, the world’s richest individual, more than 200 times over.

A Citi spokesperson addressed the incident, stating, “Despite the fact that a payment of this size could not actually have been executed, our detective controls promptly identified the inputting error between two Citi ledger accounts and we reversed the entry. Our preventative controls would have also stopped any funds leaving the bank.”

“While there was no impact to the bank or our client, the episode underscores our continued efforts to continue eliminating manual processes and automating controls through our transformation,” the spokesperson added.

Citi’s history of costly errors

This is not the first time Citigroup has been at the center of an embarrassing transaction error.

In 2020, the bank mistakenly wired $900 million to creditors of Revlon instead of making a routine interest payment.

Several hedge funds, including Brigade Capital Management, HPS Investment Partners, and Symphony Asset Management, initially refused to return the funds, leading to a protracted legal battle.

Citi fought in court for two years to recover the money, with a significant portion remaining in dispute until a 2022 court ruling finally enabled the bank to reclaim the remaining $504 million from creditors.

The episode contributed to leadership changes at the bank, including the departure of then-CEO Michael Corbat.

Other instances of “accidental transfers” by banks

Citi is not the only bank to have blundered on the front of money transfer.

In 2021, a Louisiana couple found their Chase bank account credited with $50 billion due to a bank error.

It took four days for the bank to correct the mistake, making the couple one of the richest families in the world for a brief period.

“That’s not like a one zero error or a two zero error, that’s somebody that fell asleep on the keyboard error,” Darren James, the beneficiary of the amount told CNN in a report.

The post Citigroup’s $81 trillion blunder: how a ‘fat finger’ mistake was caught appeared first on Invezz

0 comment
0
FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

previous post
GM’s EV market share doubles to 12%: will Trump’s tariffs slow momentum?
next post
Short US30: bearish momentum builds as tariff risks and key support breakdown threaten further decline

Related Posts

Asia markets eye modest gains as global cues...

May 9, 2025

Trump may slash China tariffs to 50% as...

May 9, 2025

Wall Street rallies on US-UK trade breakthrough and...

May 9, 2025

FTSE 100 shares to watch: Aviva, National Grid,...

May 9, 2025

Dollar gains weekly as markets pin hopes on...

May 9, 2025

Geopolitical tensions jeopardise energy flows in India and...

May 9, 2025

Markets fall, defence stocks jump as Indo-Pak tensions...

May 9, 2025

Europe markets open: Stoxx 600 points up; focus...

May 9, 2025

US markets today: Dow jumps as Disney dazzles,...

May 8, 2025

Top 3 US stocks to buy as the...

May 8, 2025

Stay updated with the latest news, exclusive offers, and special promotions. Sign up now and be the first to know! As a member, you'll receive curated content, insider tips, and invitations to exclusive events. Don't miss out on being part of something special.

By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

Recent Posts

  • Trade Does Not Create A National Security Externality

    May 9, 2025
  • Free Speech Is Essential to Our Human Dignity

    May 9, 2025
  • US stocks open in the green: Dow jumps over 100 points, Nasdaq up 0.6%

    May 9, 2025
  • Geopolitical tensions jeopardise energy flows in India and Pakistan

    May 9, 2025
  • Markets fall, defence stocks jump as Indo-Pak tensions flare, but analysts call reaction mild

    May 9, 2025
  • Europe markets open: Stoxx 600 points up; focus on Commerzbank earnings, US-China trade outlook

    May 9, 2025

Editors’ Picks

  • 1

    Meta executives eligible for 200% salary bonus under new pay structure

    February 21, 2025
  • 2

    Walmart earnings preview: What to expect before Thursday’s opening bell

    February 20, 2025
  • 3

    New FBI leader Kash Patel tapped to run ATF as acting director

    February 23, 2025
  • 4

    Anthropic’s newly released Claude 3.7 Sonnet can ‘think’ as long as the user wants before giving an answer

    February 25, 2025
  • 5

    Elon Musk says federal employees must fill out productivity reports or resign

    February 23, 2025
  • 6

    Nvidia’s investment in SoundHound wasn’t all that significant after all

    March 1, 2025
  • 7

    Cramer reveals a sub-sector of technology that can withstand Trump tariffs

    March 1, 2025

Categories

  • Economy (1,042)
  • Editor's Pick (106)
  • Investing (145)
  • Stock (659)
  • About us
  • Contact us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions

Copyright © 2025 Portfolioperformancetoday.com All Rights Reserved.

Portfolio Performance Today
  • Investing
  • Stock
  • Economy
  • Editor’s Pick
Portfolio Performance Today
  • Investing
  • Stock
  • Economy
  • Editor’s Pick
Copyright © 2025 Portfolioperformancetoday.com All Rights Reserved.

Read alsox

Pandora stock plunges as Trump tariffs on...

April 5, 2025

Rolls-Royce share price sits and waits for...

April 28, 2025

Is it safe to buy the Tempus...

April 9, 2025