• Investing
  • Stock
  • Economy
  • Editor’s Pick
Portfolio Performance Today
Stock

Citigroup’s $81 trillion blunder: how a ‘fat finger’ mistake was caught

by March 1, 2025
by March 1, 2025

Citigroup narrowly avoided what could have been one of the largest banking blunders in history after it mistakenly credited a client’s account with $81 trillion instead of the intended $280.

The Financial Times reported that the error was detected only after two employees overlooked it, with a third employee catching and correcting the mistake 90 minutes later.

Fortunately, no funds left the bank.

The US banking giant disclosed the incident to financial regulators, including the Federal Reserve and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, as part of its internal reporting procedures.

A near-impossible transaction

A transaction of $81 trillion is so vast that it would be unlikely to pass through any banking system without immediate red flags.

The sheer scale of the error was highlighted by comparisons with global financial benchmarks—the total US stock market was valued at $62 trillion at the end of 2024, while global wealth stood at approximately $450 trillion, according to UBS.

To put it into perspective, the erroneously credited sum would have been enough to buy all major US technology companies at a premium or acquire the assets of Elon Musk, the world’s richest individual, more than 200 times over.

A Citi spokesperson addressed the incident, stating, “Despite the fact that a payment of this size could not actually have been executed, our detective controls promptly identified the inputting error between two Citi ledger accounts and we reversed the entry. Our preventative controls would have also stopped any funds leaving the bank.”

“While there was no impact to the bank or our client, the episode underscores our continued efforts to continue eliminating manual processes and automating controls through our transformation,” the spokesperson added.

Citi’s history of costly errors

This is not the first time Citigroup has been at the center of an embarrassing transaction error.

In 2020, the bank mistakenly wired $900 million to creditors of Revlon instead of making a routine interest payment.

Several hedge funds, including Brigade Capital Management, HPS Investment Partners, and Symphony Asset Management, initially refused to return the funds, leading to a protracted legal battle.

Citi fought in court for two years to recover the money, with a significant portion remaining in dispute until a 2022 court ruling finally enabled the bank to reclaim the remaining $504 million from creditors.

The episode contributed to leadership changes at the bank, including the departure of then-CEO Michael Corbat.

Other instances of “accidental transfers” by banks

Citi is not the only bank to have blundered on the front of money transfer.

In 2021, a Louisiana couple found their Chase bank account credited with $50 billion due to a bank error.

It took four days for the bank to correct the mistake, making the couple one of the richest families in the world for a brief period.

“That’s not like a one zero error or a two zero error, that’s somebody that fell asleep on the keyboard error,” Darren James, the beneficiary of the amount told CNN in a report.

The post Citigroup’s $81 trillion blunder: how a ‘fat finger’ mistake was caught appeared first on Invezz

0 comment
0
FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

previous post
GM’s EV market share doubles to 12%: will Trump’s tariffs slow momentum?
next post
Short US30: bearish momentum builds as tariff risks and key support breakdown threaten further decline

Related Posts

Looking back at 2025: the $3.2 billion Fintech...

December 28, 2025

What US GDP report means for Fed’s rate...

December 28, 2025

Why Southwest emerged as the top US airline...

December 28, 2025

Commerzbank anticipates wheat price recovery by end of...

December 28, 2025

Nvidia stock: how Groq deal removes the last...

December 28, 2025

From Walgreens to EA: 2025 marked a banner...

December 28, 2025

Looking ahead to 2026: why hyperscalers can’t slow...

December 27, 2025

Can Saudi Arabia really undercut the world on...

December 27, 2025

Best copper stocks to buy as prices continue...

December 27, 2025

QuantumScape stock price forecast for 2026: Will QS...

December 27, 2025

Stay updated with the latest news, exclusive offers, and special promotions. Sign up now and be the first to know! As a member, you'll receive curated content, insider tips, and invitations to exclusive events. Don't miss out on being part of something special.

By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

Recent Posts

  • Looking back at 2025: the $3.2 billion Fintech IPO comeback nobody predicted

    December 28, 2025
  • What US GDP report means for Fed’s rate decision in January

    December 28, 2025
  • Why Southwest emerged as the top US airline stock in 2025?

    December 28, 2025
  • Commerzbank anticipates wheat price recovery by end of 2026 on supply constraints

    December 28, 2025
  • Nvidia stock: how Groq deal removes the last remaining bear case

    December 28, 2025
  • From Walgreens to EA: 2025 marked a banner year for take-private deals

    December 28, 2025

Editors’ Picks

  • 1

    Pop Mart reports 188% profit surge, plans aggressive global expansion

    March 26, 2025
  • 2

    Meta executives eligible for 200% salary bonus under new pay structure

    February 21, 2025
  • 3

    New FBI leader Kash Patel tapped to run ATF as acting director

    February 23, 2025
  • 4

    Walmart earnings preview: What to expect before Thursday’s opening bell

    February 20, 2025
  • 5

    Anthropic’s newly released Claude 3.7 Sonnet can ‘think’ as long as the user wants before giving an answer

    February 25, 2025
  • 6

    Cramer reveals a sub-sector of technology that can withstand Trump tariffs

    March 1, 2025
  • 7

    Nvidia’s investment in SoundHound wasn’t all that significant after all

    March 1, 2025

Categories

  • Economy (3,628)
  • Editor's Pick (374)
  • Investing (318)
  • Stock (2,450)
  • About us
  • Contact us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions

Copyright © 2025 Portfolioperformancetoday.com All Rights Reserved.

Portfolio Performance Today
  • Investing
  • Stock
  • Economy
  • Editor’s Pick
Portfolio Performance Today
  • Investing
  • Stock
  • Economy
  • Editor’s Pick
Copyright © 2025 Portfolioperformancetoday.com All Rights Reserved.

Read alsox

Yoon Suk Yeol impeachment: what investors need...

April 4, 2025

Indian markets close: Sensex plunges 589 pts,...

April 26, 2025

2 reasons why the Costco stock price...

March 15, 2025