• Investing
  • Stock
  • Economy
  • Editor’s Pick
Portfolio Performance Today
Economy

SCOTUS to hear straight woman’s discrimination case that could reshape employment law

by February 26, 2025
by February 26, 2025

The U.S. Supreme Court is poised to hear oral arguments Wednesday in a case involving an Ohio woman who claims she was unfairly discriminated against for being straight, while she watched her less-qualified LGBT colleagues in Ohio’s youth corrections system climb the career ladder.

Marlean Ames, the woman at the center of the case, argued she was discriminated against because of her heterosexuality at the Ohio Department of Youth Services and contends that her demotion and pay cut constitutes a violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The decision of the case could have a significant impact on employment law.

Ames’ case is before the Supreme Court after lower courts dismissed her claim in light of the precedent in the 1973 McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green decision. In that case, the high court created a three-step process for handling discrimination cases based on indirect evidence, with the first step being the key issue in the case.

At this first step, plaintiffs in such cases must present enough evidence to make a basic case of discrimination. This requirement applies to all plaintiffs, whether they are from minority or majority groups.

Thus, Ames is challenging the legal standard used by lower courts, which requires her to provide additional ‘background circumstances’ to ‘support the suspicion that the defendant is that unusual employer who discriminates against the majority.’ The majority in this case appears to be Ames, since she is straight. 

Ames’ attorney, Edward Gilbert, argued in a Feb. 7 court filing that this additional evidence burden is inappropriate and that discrimination should be assessed equally.

‘Judges must actually treat plaintiffs differently, by first separating them into majority and minority groups, and then imposing a ‘background circumstances’ requirement on the former but not the latter,’ the filing read. ‘In other words, to enforce Title VII’s broad rule of workplace equality, courts must apply the law unequally.’

Ames started working at the Ohio Department of Youth Services in 2004 as an executive secretary, which oversees the rehabilitation of juvenile offenders. Since 2009, she was promoted several times, and by 2014, she was promoted to program administrator, according to the Supreme Court filing.

In 2017, Ames began reporting to a new supervisor, Ginine Trim, who is openly gay. During her 2018 performance review, Trim rated Ames as meeting expectations in most areas and exceeding them in one.

However, in 2019, after Ames applied for a bureau chief position and did not get it, she was removed from her program administrator role, the court filing states. The department’s assistant director and HR head, both of whom are straight, offered her the choice to return to her previous job with a pay cut. Ames chose to remain with the department and was later promoted to a different program administrator position. The department then hired a gay woman for the bureau chief role Ames had wanted, and a gay man for the program administrator position she previously held.

After assuming Ames’ role, the co-worker ‘expressed to Ames an ‘impatient attitude towards climbing the ranks within the Department,’ ‘claim[ed] that he could manipulate people to get what he wanted on the basis of being a gay man,’ and ‘acknowledge[d]; that he had ’been angling for Ames’s position for some time, stating in front of their coworkers that he wanted the PREA Administrator position,” according to the filing.

In an amicus brief filed by Elizabeth Prelogar, the U.S. solicitor general under the Biden administration, the federal government supports Marlean Ames’ argument. Prelogar said the ‘background circumstances’ requirement imposed by the lower court has no basis in Title VII of the Civil Rights Act and goes against the Court’s past rulings, which allow all plaintiffs to be judged by the same standards, SCOTUS Blog reported.

On the other hand, the Ohio Department of Youth Services disagrees with the idea that Ames was held to a higher standard because she is straight. The department argued that the ‘background circumstances’ rule is not an additional burden on plaintiffs, but rather a ‘method of analysis’ to examine cases like Ames’ without creating a new legal precedent.

The Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in the case Wednesday morning, with a ruling expected by the end of June. 

The case’s hearing before the high court comes amid a second Trump administration that is working to dismantle Diversity, Equity and Inclusion (DEI) initiatives in the federal sector while pressuring private sectors to do the same. 

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

0 comment
0
FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

previous post
Funeral held for Shiri Bibas and her sons after their remains handed over by Hamas
next post
Analysts back Trump’s USAID cuts in Africa, say increased trade will better benefit continent’s poor

Related Posts

Bolivia’s Defeat of Socialism Signals a Continental Realignment

August 28, 2025

Economic Measurement and the Mirage of Exactness

August 28, 2025

Economic Measurement and the Mirage of Exactness

August 28, 2025

Bolivia’s Defeat of Socialism Signals a Continental Realignment

August 28, 2025

Mike Johnson hits iconic Nashville bar, blasts Dems...

August 28, 2025

Trump touts massive fundraising haul since winning 2024...

August 28, 2025

Apple expected to roll out texting update that...

August 28, 2025

Cracker Barrel’s logo mea culpa is a start...

August 28, 2025

Trump asks SCOTUS to uphold freeze on billions...

August 28, 2025

White House demands all Gaza hostages return home...

August 28, 2025

Stay updated with the latest news, exclusive offers, and special promotions. Sign up now and be the first to know! As a member, you'll receive curated content, insider tips, and invitations to exclusive events. Don't miss out on being part of something special.

By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

Recent Posts

  • Bolivia’s Defeat of Socialism Signals a Continental Realignment

    August 28, 2025
  • Economic Measurement and the Mirage of Exactness

    August 28, 2025
  • Netmore Partners with Detectronic on Multi-Year Wastewater Management Sensor Deployment

    August 28, 2025
  • Bolivia’s Defeat of Socialism Signals a Continental Realignment

    August 28, 2025
  • Economic Measurement and the Mirage of Exactness

    August 28, 2025
  • Eseye Solidifies Global IoT Leadership with Leading Position in Brazil’s High-Growth Cellular Connectivity Market

    August 28, 2025

Editors’ Picks

  • 1

    Meta executives eligible for 200% salary bonus under new pay structure

    February 21, 2025
  • 2

    Walmart earnings preview: What to expect before Thursday’s opening bell

    February 20, 2025
  • 3

    New FBI leader Kash Patel tapped to run ATF as acting director

    February 23, 2025
  • 4

    Anthropic’s newly released Claude 3.7 Sonnet can ‘think’ as long as the user wants before giving an answer

    February 25, 2025
  • 5

    Cramer reveals a sub-sector of technology that can withstand Trump tariffs

    March 1, 2025
  • 6

    Nvidia’s investment in SoundHound wasn’t all that significant after all

    March 1, 2025
  • 7

    Elon Musk says federal employees must fill out productivity reports or resign

    February 23, 2025

Categories

  • Economy (2,356)
  • Editor's Pick (228)
  • Investing (185)
  • Stock (1,593)
  • About us
  • Contact us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions

Copyright © 2025 Portfolioperformancetoday.com All Rights Reserved.

Portfolio Performance Today
  • Investing
  • Stock
  • Economy
  • Editor’s Pick
Portfolio Performance Today
  • Investing
  • Stock
  • Economy
  • Editor’s Pick
Copyright © 2025 Portfolioperformancetoday.com All Rights Reserved.

Read alsox

Trump’s 39% Tariff on Gold: Revenue Grab...

August 8, 2025

Trump’s China tariffs set to unleash supply...

April 28, 2025

State Department confirms ‘constructive’ nuclear talks with...

May 16, 2025